These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34419837)

  • 1. Validation of 4D Flow based relative pressure maps in aortic flows.
    Nolte D; Urbina J; Sotelo J; Sok L; Montalba C; Valverde I; Osses A; Uribe S; Bertoglio C
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Dec; 74():102195. PubMed ID: 34419837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers.
    Rengier F; Delles M; Eichhorn J; Azad YJ; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Dillmann R; Kauczor HU; Unterhinninghofen R; Ley S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr; 31(4):823-30. PubMed ID: 25645544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of 4D flow MRI-based non-invasive pressure assessment in aortic coarctations.
    Saitta S; Pirola S; Piatti F; Votta E; Lucherini F; Pluchinotta F; Carminati M; Lombardi M; Geppert C; Cuomo F; Figueroa CA; Xu XY; Redaelli A
    J Biomech; 2019 Sep; 94():13-21. PubMed ID: 31326119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative pressure estimation from velocity measurements in blood flows: State-of-the-art and new approaches.
    Bertoglio C; Nuñez R; Galarce F; Nordsletten D; Osses A
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Feb; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 28884520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of 4D flow MRI's quality by verifying its Navier-Stokes compatibility.
    Garay J; Mella H; Sotelo J; Cárcamo C; Uribe S; Bertoglio C; Mura J
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Jun; 38(6):e3603. PubMed ID: 35434919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping in the human aorta: phantom comparison and application in healthy volunteers and patients.
    Bock J; Frydrychowicz A; Lorenz R; Hirtler D; Barker AJ; Johnson KM; Arnold R; Burkhardt H; Hennig J; Markl M
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Oct; 66(4):1079-88. PubMed ID: 21437978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Realistic aortic phantom to study hemodynamics using MRI and cardiac catheterization in normal and aortic coarctation conditions.
    Urbina J; Sotelo JA; Springmüller D; Montalba C; Letelier K; Tejos C; Irarrázaval P; Andia ME; Razavi R; Valverde I; Uribe SA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 44(3):683-97. PubMed ID: 26969867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-specific requirements and clinical validation of MRI-based pressure mapping: A two-center study in patients with aortic coarctation.
    Goubergrits L; Hellmeier F; Neumann D; Mihalef V; Gulsun MA; Chinali M; Secinaro A; Runte K; Schubert S; Berger F; Kuehne T; Hennemuth A; Kelm M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 49(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 30390353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainty Quantification for Non-invasive Assessment of Pressure Drop Across a Coarctation of the Aorta Using CFD.
    Brüning J; Hellmeier F; Yevtushenko P; Kühne T; Goubergrits L
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):582-596. PubMed ID: 30284186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Reynolds stress components and turbulent pressure loss using 4D flow MRI with extended motion encoding.
    Haraldsson H; Kefayati S; Ahn S; Dyverfeldt P; Lantz J; Karlsson M; Laub G; Ebbers T; Saloner D
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):1962-1971. PubMed ID: 28745409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 4D Flow MRI-based pressure loss estimation in stenotic flows: Evaluation using numerical simulations.
    Casas B; Lantz J; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Apr; 75(4):1808-21. PubMed ID: 26016805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-V
    Callahan S; Singam NS; Kendrick M; Negahdar MJ; Wang H; Stoddard MF; Amini AA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jul; 52(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 31850597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel and facile criterion to assess the accuracy of WSS estimation by 4D flow MRI.
    Ko S; Yang B; Cho JH; Lee J; Song S
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Apr; 53():95-103. PubMed ID: 30743192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI-based computational hemodynamics in patients with aortic coarctation using the lattice Boltzmann methods: Clinical validation study.
    Mirzaee H; Henn T; Krause MJ; Goubergrits L; Schumann C; Neugebauer M; Kuehne T; Preusser T; Hennemuth A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 27384018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure fields by flow-sensitive, 4D, velocity-encoded CMR in patients with aortic coarctation.
    Riesenkampff E; Fernandes JF; Meier S; Goubergrits L; Kropf S; Schubert S; Berger F; Hennemuth A; Kuehne T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Sep; 7(9):920-6. PubMed ID: 25212797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. k-t accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI in under two minutes: Feasibility and impact of resolution, k-space sampling patterns, and respiratory navigator gating on hemodynamic measurements.
    Bollache E; Barker AJ; Dolan RS; Carr JC; van Ooij P; Ahmadian R; Powell A; Collins JD; Geiger J; Markl M
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):195-207. PubMed ID: 28266062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noninvasive pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with unrepaired and repaired aortic coarctation.
    Rengier F; Delles M; Eichhorn J; Azad YJ; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Dillmann R; Kauczor HU; Unterhinninghofen R; Ley S
    Cardiovasc Diagn Ther; 2014 Apr; 4(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 24834408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 4D Flow MRI Pressure Estimation Using Velocity Measurement-Error-Based Weighted Least-Squares.
    Zhang J; Brindise MC; Rothenberger S; Schnell S; Markl M; Saloner D; Rayz VL; Vlachos PP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 May; 39(5):1668-1680. PubMed ID: 31751234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 4D Flow MRI quantification of blood flow patterns, turbulence and pressure drop in normal and stenotic prosthetic heart valves.
    Ha H; Kvitting JP; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 55():118-127. PubMed ID: 30266627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of pressure drop assessment using 4D flow MRI-based turbulence production in various shapes of aortic stenoses.
    Ha H; Kvitting JP; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):893-906. PubMed ID: 30252155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.