These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34420070)

  • 1. Integration of visual landmark cues in spatial memory.
    Newman PM; McNamara TP
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jul; 86(5):1636-1654. PubMed ID: 34420070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal combination of environmental cues and path integration during navigation.
    Sjolund LA; Kelly JW; McNamara TP
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 28828745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are visual cues helpful for virtual spatial navigation and spatial memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease?
    Cogné M; Auriacombe S; Vasa L; Tison F; Klinger E; Sauzéon H; Joseph PA; N Kaoua B
    Neuropsychology; 2018 May; 32(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 29809030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aging and spatial cues influence the updating of navigational memories.
    Merhav M; Wolbers T
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11469. PubMed ID: 31391574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of older age on visual and self-motion sensory cue integration in navigation.
    Shayman CS; McCracken MK; Finney HC; Katsanevas AM; Fino PC; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jun; 242(6):1277-1289. PubMed ID: 38548892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of age in women in visuo-spatial memory in reaching and navigation tasks with and without landmarks.
    Perrochon A; Mandigout S; Petruzzellis S; Soria Garcia N; Zaoui M; Berthoz A; Daviet JC
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 684():13-17. PubMed ID: 29966753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Not seeing the forest for the trees: combination of path integration and landmark cues in human virtual navigation.
    Scherer J; Müller MM; Unterbrink P; Meier S; Egelhaaf M; Bertrand OJN; Boeddeker N
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2024; 18():1399716. PubMed ID: 38835838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finding Home: Landmark Ambiguity in Human Navigation.
    Jetzschke S; Ernst MO; Froehlich J; Boeddeker N
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2017; 11():132. PubMed ID: 28769773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistically Optimal Cue Integration During Human Spatial Navigation.
    Newman PM; Qi Y; Mou W; McNamara TP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Oct; 30(5):1621-1642. PubMed ID: 37038031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vision and proprioception make equal contributions to path integration in a novel homing task.
    Chrastil ER; Nicora GL; Huang A
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103998. PubMed ID: 31228680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Olfactory landmarks and path integration converge to form a cognitive spatial map.
    Fischler-Ruiz W; Clark DG; Joshi NR; Devi-Chou V; Kitch L; Schnitzer M; Abbott LF; Axel R
    Neuron; 2021 Dec; 109(24):4036-4049.e5. PubMed ID: 34710366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian decision theory and navigation.
    McNamara TP; Chen X
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):721-752. PubMed ID: 34820786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential Representation of Landmark and Self-Motion Information along the CA1 Radial Axis: Self-Motion Generated Place Fields Shift toward Landmarks during Septal Inactivation.
    Fattahi M; Sharif F; Geiller T; Royer S
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 38(30):6766-6778. PubMed ID: 29954846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual cue-related activity of cells in the medial entorhinal cortex during navigation in virtual reality.
    Kinkhabwala AA; Gu Y; Aronov D; Tank DW
    Elife; 2020 Mar; 9():. PubMed ID: 32149601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How you get there from here: interaction of visual landmarks and path integration in human navigation.
    Zhao M; Warren WH
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jun; 26(6):915-24. PubMed ID: 25944773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vestibular cues improve landmark-based route navigation: A simulated driving study.
    Jabbari Y; Kenney DM; von Mohrenschildt M; Shedden JM
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 34018119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How cognitive aging affects multisensory integration of navigational cues.
    Bates SL; Wolbers T
    Neurobiol Aging; 2014 Dec; 35(12):2761-2769. PubMed ID: 24952995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective resetting position and heading estimations while driving in a large-scale immersive virtual environment.
    Zhang L; Mou W
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 237(2):335-350. PubMed ID: 30406817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coding Locations Relative to One or Many Landmarks in Childhood.
    Negen J; Bou Ali L; Chere B; Roome HE; Park Y; Nardini M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Oct; 15(10):e1007380. PubMed ID: 31658253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novel Virtual Reality System for Auditory Tasks in Head-fixed Mice.
    Gao S; Webb J; Mridha Z; Banta A; Kemere C; McGinley M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():2925-2928. PubMed ID: 33018619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.