BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34420096)

  • 1. TALENs-an indispensable tool in the era of CRISPR: a mini review.
    Bhardwaj A; Nain V
    J Genet Eng Biotechnol; 2021 Aug; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 34420096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CRISPR/Cas9: an advanced tool for editing plant genomes.
    Samanta MK; Dey A; Gayen S
    Transgenic Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):561-73. PubMed ID: 27012546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of genome editing technologies to the study and treatment of hematological disease.
    Pellagatti A; Dolatshad H; Yip BH; Valletta S; Boultwood J
    Adv Biol Regul; 2016 Jan; 60():122-134. PubMed ID: 26433620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applications of Alternative Nucleases in the Age of CRISPR/Cas9.
    Guha TK; Edgell DR
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Nov; 18(12):. PubMed ID: 29186020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Insight into Modern Targeted Genome-Editing Technologies with a Special Focus on CRISPR/Cas9 and its Applications.
    Akram F; Sahreen S; Aamir F; Haq IU; Malik K; Imtiaz M; Naseem W; Nasir N; Waheed HM
    Mol Biotechnol; 2023 Feb; 65(2):227-242. PubMed ID: 35474409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. INDEL detection, the 'Achilles heel' of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels.
    Bennett EP; Petersen BL; Johansen IE; Niu Y; Yang Z; Chamberlain CA; Met Ö; Wandall HH; Frödin M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Dec; 48(21):11958-11981. PubMed ID: 33170255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of Genome Editing Mutations in Cereal Crops.
    Zhu C; Bortesi L; Baysal C; Twyman RM; Fischer R; Capell T; Schillberg S; Christou P
    Trends Plant Sci; 2017 Jan; 22(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 27645899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Origins of Programmable Nucleases for Genome Engineering.
    Chandrasegaran S; Carroll D
    J Mol Biol; 2016 Feb; 428(5 Pt B):963-89. PubMed ID: 26506267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Engineered Viruses as Genome Editing Devices.
    Chen X; Gonçalves MA
    Mol Ther; 2016 Mar; 24(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 26336974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genome centric engineering using ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 systems for trait improvement and disease control in Animals.
    Wani AK; Akhtar N; Singh R; Prakash A; Raza SHA; Cavalu S; Chopra C; Madkour M; Elolimy A; Hashem NM
    Vet Res Commun; 2023 Jan; 47(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 35781172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring and Reducing Off-Target Activities of Programmable Nucleases Including CRISPR-Cas9.
    Koo T; Lee J; Kim JS
    Mol Cells; 2015 Jun; 38(6):475-81. PubMed ID: 25985872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Basics of genome editing technology and its application in livestock species.
    Petersen B
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2017 Aug; 52 Suppl 3():4-13. PubMed ID: 28815851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concerns regarding 'off-target' activity of genome editing endonucleases.
    Kadam US; Shelake RM; Chavhan RL; Suprasanna P
    Plant Physiol Biochem; 2018 Oct; 131():22-30. PubMed ID: 29653762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Revolution toward Gene-Editing Technology and Its Application to Crop Improvement.
    Ahmar S; Saeed S; Khan MHU; Ullah Khan S; Mora-Poblete F; Kamran M; Faheem A; Maqsood A; Rauf M; Saleem S; Hong WJ; Jung KH
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 32784649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genome Editing in Sugarcane: Challenges Ahead.
    Mohan C
    Front Plant Sci; 2016; 7():1542. PubMed ID: 27790238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities.
    Abdallah NA; Prakash CS; McHughen AG
    GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(4):183-205. PubMed ID: 26930114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of gene editing efficiencies of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN for generation of MSTN knock-out cashmere goats.
    Zhang J; Liu J; Yang W; Cui M; Dai B; Dong Y; Yang J; Zhang X; Liu D; Liang H; Cang M
    Theriogenology; 2019 Jul; 132():1-11. PubMed ID: 30981084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CRISPR-Cas9 Technology for the Creation of Biological Avatars Capable of Modeling and Treating Pathologies: From Discovery to the Latest Improvements.
    Nasrallah A; Sulpice E; Kobaisi F; Gidrol X; Rachidi W
    Cells; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36429042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modern Trends in Plant Genome Editing: An Inclusive Review of the CRISPR/Cas9 Toolbox.
    Razzaq A; Saleem F; Kanwal M; Mustafa G; Yousaf S; Imran Arshad HM; Hameed MK; Khan MS; Joyia FA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Aug; 20(16):. PubMed ID: 31430902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants.
    Osakabe Y; Osakabe K
    Plant Cell Physiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 25416289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.