These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34420096)

  • 1. TALENs-an indispensable tool in the era of CRISPR: a mini review.
    Bhardwaj A; Nain V
    J Genet Eng Biotechnol; 2021 Aug; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 34420096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CRISPR/Cas9: an advanced tool for editing plant genomes.
    Samanta MK; Dey A; Gayen S
    Transgenic Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):561-73. PubMed ID: 27012546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of genome editing technologies to the study and treatment of hematological disease.
    Pellagatti A; Dolatshad H; Yip BH; Valletta S; Boultwood J
    Adv Biol Regul; 2016 Jan; 60():122-134. PubMed ID: 26433620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applications of Alternative Nucleases in the Age of CRISPR/Cas9.
    Guha TK; Edgell DR
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Nov; 18(12):. PubMed ID: 29186020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Insight into Modern Targeted Genome-Editing Technologies with a Special Focus on CRISPR/Cas9 and its Applications.
    Akram F; Sahreen S; Aamir F; Haq IU; Malik K; Imtiaz M; Naseem W; Nasir N; Waheed HM
    Mol Biotechnol; 2023 Feb; 65(2):227-242. PubMed ID: 35474409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. INDEL detection, the 'Achilles heel' of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels.
    Bennett EP; Petersen BL; Johansen IE; Niu Y; Yang Z; Chamberlain CA; Met Ö; Wandall HH; Frödin M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Dec; 48(21):11958-11981. PubMed ID: 33170255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of Genome Editing Mutations in Cereal Crops.
    Zhu C; Bortesi L; Baysal C; Twyman RM; Fischer R; Capell T; Schillberg S; Christou P
    Trends Plant Sci; 2017 Jan; 22(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 27645899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Origins of Programmable Nucleases for Genome Engineering.
    Chandrasegaran S; Carroll D
    J Mol Biol; 2016 Feb; 428(5 Pt B):963-89. PubMed ID: 26506267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Engineered Viruses as Genome Editing Devices.
    Chen X; Gonçalves MA
    Mol Ther; 2016 Mar; 24(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 26336974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genome centric engineering using ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 systems for trait improvement and disease control in Animals.
    Wani AK; Akhtar N; Singh R; Prakash A; Raza SHA; Cavalu S; Chopra C; Madkour M; Elolimy A; Hashem NM
    Vet Res Commun; 2023 Jan; 47(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 35781172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring and Reducing Off-Target Activities of Programmable Nucleases Including CRISPR-Cas9.
    Koo T; Lee J; Kim JS
    Mol Cells; 2015 Jun; 38(6):475-81. PubMed ID: 25985872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Basics of genome editing technology and its application in livestock species.
    Petersen B
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2017 Aug; 52 Suppl 3():4-13. PubMed ID: 28815851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concerns regarding 'off-target' activity of genome editing endonucleases.
    Kadam US; Shelake RM; Chavhan RL; Suprasanna P
    Plant Physiol Biochem; 2018 Oct; 131():22-30. PubMed ID: 29653762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Revolution toward Gene-Editing Technology and Its Application to Crop Improvement.
    Ahmar S; Saeed S; Khan MHU; Ullah Khan S; Mora-Poblete F; Kamran M; Faheem A; Maqsood A; Rauf M; Saleem S; Hong WJ; Jung KH
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 32784649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genome Editing in Sugarcane: Challenges Ahead.
    Mohan C
    Front Plant Sci; 2016; 7():1542. PubMed ID: 27790238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities.
    Abdallah NA; Prakash CS; McHughen AG
    GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(4):183-205. PubMed ID: 26930114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of gene editing efficiencies of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN for generation of MSTN knock-out cashmere goats.
    Zhang J; Liu J; Yang W; Cui M; Dai B; Dong Y; Yang J; Zhang X; Liu D; Liang H; Cang M
    Theriogenology; 2019 Jul; 132():1-11. PubMed ID: 30981084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CRISPR-Cas9 Technology for the Creation of Biological Avatars Capable of Modeling and Treating Pathologies: From Discovery to the Latest Improvements.
    Nasrallah A; Sulpice E; Kobaisi F; Gidrol X; Rachidi W
    Cells; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36429042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modern Trends in Plant Genome Editing: An Inclusive Review of the CRISPR/Cas9 Toolbox.
    Razzaq A; Saleem F; Kanwal M; Mustafa G; Yousaf S; Imran Arshad HM; Hameed MK; Khan MS; Joyia FA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Aug; 20(16):. PubMed ID: 31430902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants.
    Osakabe Y; Osakabe K
    Plant Cell Physiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 25416289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.