These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34421122)

  • 1. A Polytomous Scoring Approach to Handle Not-Reached Items in Low-Stakes Assessments.
    Gorgun G; Bulut O
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 81(5):847-871. PubMed ID: 34421122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Note on the
    Dimitrov DM; Luo Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 79(3):545-557. PubMed ID: 31105322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polytomous Testlet Response Models for Technology-Enhanced Innovative Items: Implications on Model Fit and Trait Inference.
    Kang HA; Han S; Kim D; Kao SC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Aug; 82(4):811-838. PubMed ID: 35754615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the Importance of the Speed-Ability Trade-Off When Dealing With Not Reached Items.
    Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():964. PubMed ID: 29951023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Location-Matching Adaptive Testing for Polytomous Technology-Enhanced Items.
    Kang HA; Arbet G; Betts J; Muntean W
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2024 Mar; 48(1-2):57-76. PubMed ID: 38327610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effects of Personalized Nudges on Cognitively Disengaged Student Behavior in Low-Stakes Assessments.
    Arslan B; Finn B
    J Intell; 2023 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 37998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
    Vispoel WP; Kim HY
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring Rubric-Related Multidimensionality in Polytomously Scored Test Items.
    Bolt DM; Adams DJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 May; 41(3):163-177. PubMed ID: 29881086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating Different Scoring Methods for Multiple Response Items Providing Partial Credit.
    Betts J; Muntean W; Kim D; Kao SC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Feb; 82(1):151-176. PubMed ID: 34992310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Measurement Invariance of the Student Opinion Scale across English and Non-English Language Learner Students within the Context of Low- and High-Stakes Assessments.
    Immekus JC; McGee D
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1352. PubMed ID: 27672375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A diagnostic tree model for polytomous responses with multiple strategies.
    Ma W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):61-82. PubMed ID: 29687453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Multiprocess Item Response Model for Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits and Quitting.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):522-547. PubMed ID: 32425218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple-choice tests: polytomous IRT models misestimate item information.
    García-Pérez MA
    Span J Psychol; 2014 Dec; 17():E88. PubMed ID: 26054359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of undergraduate medical student script concordance test (SCT) scores on the clinical assessment of the acute abdomen.
    Goos M; Schubach F; Seifert G; Boeker M
    BMC Surg; 2016 Aug; 16(1):57. PubMed ID: 27535826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying Disengaged Responding in Multiple-Choice Items: Extending a Latent Class Item Response Model With Novel Process Data Indicators.
    Welling J; Gnambs T; Carstensen CH
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Apr; 84(2):314-339. PubMed ID: 38898880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Goodness of fit in polytomous items: Type I error rates and empirical power for three fit-indexes].
    Sueiro MJ; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2009 Nov; 21(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 19861112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.
    Richter Lagha RA; Boscardin CK; May W; Fung CC
    Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22722349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring Motivation to Take Low-Stakes Large-Scale Test: New Model Based on Analyses of "Participant-Own-Defined" Missingness.
    Liu Y; Hau KT
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1115-1144. PubMed ID: 33116329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the Speed Sensitivity Parameter in the Lognormal Model for Response Times and Implications for High-Stakes Measurement Practice.
    Becker B; Debeer D; Weirich S; Goldhammer F
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Sep; 45(6):407-422. PubMed ID: 34565944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomously Scored Items.
    Tu D; Han Y; Cai Y; Gao X
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Nov; 42(8):677-694. PubMed ID: 30559574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.