185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34421215)
21. Radiotransparency of the triglyceride mammary prosthesis: a quantitative analysis with mastectomy specimens.
García-Tutor E; Hontanilla B; Agreda J; Bazán A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Sep; 104(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 10456518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast Density Should Play a Greater Role in MRI Screening Guidelines.
Hollingsworth AB; Li FY; Stough-Clinton RG
Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37109. PubMed ID: 37168218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Screening mammography: factors associated with adherence to recommended age/frequency guidelines.
Hitchcock JL; Steckevicz MJ; Thompson WD
Womens Health; 1995; 1(3):221-35. PubMed ID: 9373381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reduced mortality rate associated with annual mammograms after breast cancer therapy.
Lash TL; Fox MP; Silliman RA
Breast J; 2006; 12(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 16409580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A new near-term breast cancer risk prediction scheme based on the quantitative analysis of ipsilateral view mammograms.
Sun W; Tseng TB; Qian W; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Yu H; Zhou S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 155():29-38. PubMed ID: 29512502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characteristics of Invasive Breast Cancer Detected by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Screening and Diagnostic Mammograms.
Baydoun SE; Yang L; Xiong J; Fajardo LL
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 May; 72(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 32062995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Early detection and classification of abnormality in prior mammograms using image-to-image translation and YOLO techniques.
Baccouche A; Garcia-Zapirain B; Zheng Y; Elmaghraby AS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 221():106884. PubMed ID: 35594582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.
Pace LE; Keating NL
JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1327-35. PubMed ID: 24691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use and abuse of mammography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer.
Mahoney L; Csima A
Can J Surg; 1983 May; 26(3):262-3, 265. PubMed ID: 6850440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A failure analysis of invasive breast cancer: most deaths from disease occur in women not regularly screened.
Webb ML; Cady B; Michaelson JS; Bush DM; Calvillo KZ; Kopans DB; Smith BL
Cancer; 2014 Sep; 120(18):2839-46. PubMed ID: 24018987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.
Harvey JA; Fajardo LL; Innis CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8249720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Supporting breast cancer screening decisions for caregivers of older women with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Fowler NR; Schonberg MA; Sachs GA; Schwartz PH; Gao S; Lane KA; Inger L; Torke AM
Trials; 2018 Dec; 19(1):678. PubMed ID: 30541634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.
Bond M; Pavey T; Welch K; Cooper C; Garside R; Dean S; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(13):1-170, v-vi. PubMed ID: 23540978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading.
Mello-Thoms C; Hardesty L; Sumkin J; Ganott M; Hakim C; Britton C; Stalder J; Maitz G
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 16039537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Women's views on breast cancer risk and screening mammography: a qualitative interview study.
Silverman E; Woloshin S; Schwartz LM; Byram SJ; Welch HG; Fischhoff B
Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 11386630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
