These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34421550)

  • 1. Parsing the Neural Mechanisms of Short-Term and Long-Term Associations in the Flanker Tasks: An ERP Analysis.
    Cheng W; Huang Q; Chen Y; Dai W; Cui L; Shan S; Chen Z; Zhou S
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2021; 15():626907. PubMed ID: 34421550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flanker paradigm contains conflict and distraction factors with distinct neural mechanisms: an ERP analysis in a 2-1 mapping task.
    Zhou S; Xiong S; Cheng W; Wang Y
    Cogn Neurodyn; 2019 Aug; 13(4):341-356. PubMed ID: 31354880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
    Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Twisting tongues to test for conflict-monitoring in speech production.
    Acheson DJ; Hagoort P
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():206. PubMed ID: 24795592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflict-Specific Aging Effects Mainly Manifest in Early Information Processing Stages-An ERP Study with Different Conflict Types.
    Korsch M; Frühholz S; Herrmann M
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2016; 8():53. PubMed ID: 27014059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural cascade of conflict processing: Not just time-on-task.
    McKay CC; van den Berg B; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():184-191. PubMed ID: 28017818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frontal and occipital-parietal alpha oscillations distinguish between stimulus conflict and response conflict.
    Tang D; Hu L; Lei Y; Li H; Chen A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():433. PubMed ID: 26300758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parsing the Flanker task to reveal behavioral and oscillatory correlates of unattended conflict interference.
    Brunetti M; Zappasodi F; Croce P; Di Matteo R
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13883. PubMed ID: 31554881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks.
    Tillman CM; Wiens S
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1405-11. PubMed ID: 21457276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neurophysiological indices of the transfer of cognitive training gains to untrained tasks.
    Wang X; Covey TJ
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 May; 171():107205. PubMed ID: 32145406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus- and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task.
    Verbruggen F; Notebaert W; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 16893003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurodevelopment of conflict adaptation: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Liu X; Liu T; Shangguan F; Sørensen TA; Liu Q; Shi J
    Dev Psychol; 2018 Jul; 54(7):1347-1362. PubMed ID: 29756794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory conflict processing: behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of the stroop effect.
    Henkin Y; Yaar-Soffer Y; Gilat S; Muchnik C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):474-86. PubMed ID: 20807483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neural dynamics of stimulus and response conflict processing as a function of response complexity and task demands.
    Donohue SE; Appelbaum LG; McKay CC; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():14-28. PubMed ID: 26827917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does conflict control occur without awareness? Evidence from an ERP study.
    Wang B; Xiang L; Li J
    Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 1490():161-9. PubMed ID: 23123206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects stimulus conflict but not response conflict.
    Zmigrod S; Zmigrod L; Hommel B
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():320-5. PubMed ID: 26924018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task.
    Stins JF; Polderman JC; Boomsma DI; de Geus EJ
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2008 Jul; 3(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 20517524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks.
    Freitas AL; Bahar M; Yang S; Banai R
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Dec; 18(12):1040-3. PubMed ID: 18031409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive conflict could facilitate negative stimulus processing: evidence from trait anxiety in the flanker paradigm.
    Pan F; Ou Y; Zhang L; Zhang X
    Neuroreport; 2019 May; 30(7):473-478. PubMed ID: 30817681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.