These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34422582)

  • 1. Direct comparison of CGCRYODERM and DermACELL in the same patient for outcomes in bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction: a retrospective case series.
    Jeon S; Ha JH; Jin US
    Gland Surg; 2021 Jul; 10(7):2113-2122. PubMed ID: 34422582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A retrospective review of breast reconstruction outcomes comparing AlloDerm and DermaCELL.
    Greig H; Roller J; Ziaziaris W; Van Laeken N
    JPRAS Open; 2019 Dec; 22():19-26. PubMed ID: 32158893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No Differences in Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes among AlloDerm, SurgiMend, and Dermacell for Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Asaad M; Morris N; Selber JC; Liu J; Clemens MW; Adelman DM; Chang EI; Butler CE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 May; 151(5):719e-729e. PubMed ID: 36525574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the effectiveness of cryopreserved acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a comparison study.
    Kim SY; Lim SY; Mun GH; Bang SI; Oh KS; Pyon JK
    Arch Plast Surg; 2015 May; 42(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 26015887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review.
    Swisher AR; Landau MJ; Kadakia N; Holzmer SW; Kim HY
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2022 Jun; 10(6):e4396. PubMed ID: 35747252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study between sterile freeze-dried and sterile pre-hydrated acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
    Cheon JH; Yoon ES; Kim JW; Park SH; Lee BI
    Arch Plast Surg; 2019 May; 46(3):204-213. PubMed ID: 31113183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of patient-reported outcomes between Alloderm and Dermacell in immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction: A randomized control trial.
    Stein MJ; Arnaout A; Lichtenstein JB; Frank SG; Cordeiro E; Roberts A; Ghaedi B; Zhang J
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Jan; 74(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 32893151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acellular bovine pericardium dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction after Skin Sparing Mastectomy.
    Gubitosi A; Docimo G; Parmeggiani D; Pirozzi R; Vitiello C; Schettino P; Avellino M; Casalino G; Amato M; Ruggiero R; Docimo L
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12 Suppl 1():S205-8. PubMed ID: 24859403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
    Ball JF; Sheena Y; Tarek Saleh DM; Forouhi P; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Malata CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 28624524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complication prevalence following use of tutoplast-derived human acellular dermal matrix in prosthetic breast reconstruction: a retrospective review of 203 patients.
    Rundell VL; Beck RT; Wang CE; Gutowski KA; Sisco M; Fenner G; Howard MA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1345-51. PubMed ID: 24917371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrix Use on Complication Rates in Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstructions.
    Lee JH; Park Y; Choi KW; Chung KJ; Kim TG; Kim YH
    Arch Plast Surg; 2016 Nov; 43(6):523-528. PubMed ID: 27896182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Alloderm-RTU with DermACELL in Immediate Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Arnaout A; Zhang J; Frank S; Momtazi M; Cordeiro E; Roberts A; Ghumman A; Fergusson D; Stober C; Pond G; Jeong A; Vandermeer L; Hutton B; Clemons M; On Behalf Of The REaCT Investigators
    Curr Oncol; 2020 Dec; 28(1):184-195. PubMed ID: 33704185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acellular dermal matrices as an adjunct to implant breast reconstruction: Analysis of outcomes and complications.
    Tasoulis MK; Teoh V; Khan A; Montgomery C; Mohammed K; Gui G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):511-515. PubMed ID: 31706716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective unbiased experience with three acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstruction.
    Chang EI; Liu J
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 28444764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction Patients Using a Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft.
    Ortiz JA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 41(3):542-550. PubMed ID: 28280894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction.
    Zenn MR; Salzberg CA
    Eplasty; 2016; 16():e23. PubMed ID: 27602176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complications after Perforated versus Nonperforated Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis.
    Wood KL; Margulies IG; Shay PL; Ashikari AY; Salzberg CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Mar; 8(3):e2690. PubMed ID: 32537347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Different Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstruction: The 50/50 Study.
    Pittman TA; Fan KL; Knapp A; Frantz S; Spear SL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Mar; 139(3):521-528. PubMed ID: 28234811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complication Rate of Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrices.
    Mangialardi ML; Salgarello M; Cacciatore P; Baldelli I; Raposio E
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):e3235. PubMed ID: 33425578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of sterile versus nonsterile acellular dermal matrices for breast reconstruction.
    Buseman J; Wong L; Kemper P; Hill JL; Nimtz J; Rinker B; Vasconez HC
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 May; 70(5):497-9. PubMed ID: 23542856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.