These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34423430)

  • 1. Lexize: A test to quickly assess vocabulary knowledge in Finnish.
    Salmela R; Lehtonen M; Garusi S; Bertram R
    Scand J Psychol; 2021 Dec; 62(6):806-819. PubMed ID: 34423430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introducing LexTALE: a quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English.
    Lemhöfer K; Broersma M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):325-43. PubMed ID: 21898159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. LexMAL: A quick and reliable lexical test for Malay speakers.
    Lee ST; van Heuven WJB; Price JM; Leong CXR
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37658257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective age of acquisition norms for 1604 English words by Spanish L2 speakers of English and their relationship with lexico-semantic, affective, sociolinguistic and proficiency variables.
    Rodriguez-Cuadrado S; Hinojosa JA; Guasch M; Romero-Rivas C; Sabater L; Suárez-Coalla P; Ferré P
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4437-4454. PubMed ID: 36477592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.
    Kasparian K; Steinhauer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):200-217. PubMed ID: 27751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonological and orthographic vocabulary knowledge and processing speed of L2 written text: the case of native Arabic EFL learners.
    Masrai A
    Cogn Process; 2021 Feb; 22(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 32862339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading.
    Cop U; Keuleers E; Drieghe D; Duyck W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1216-34. PubMed ID: 25877485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adolescent language outcomes in a complex trilingual context: When typical does not mean unproblematic.
    Thordardottir E
    J Commun Disord; 2021; 89():106060. PubMed ID: 33291036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the L2 lexicon different from the L1 lexicon? Evidence from novel word lexicalization.
    Qiao X; Forster KI
    Cognition; 2017 Jan; 158():147-152. PubMed ID: 27835785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical knowledge and L2 general language proficiency: collocational competence and vocabulary size as determinants of lexical knowledge.
    Masrai A
    Cogn Process; 2023 May; 24(2):289-300. PubMed ID: 36547821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the author recognition test a useful metric for native and non-native English speakers? An item response theory analysis.
    McCarron SP; Kuperman V
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2226-2237. PubMed ID: 33821455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Segmentation by lexical subtraction in Hungarian speakers of second-language English.
    White L; Melhorn JF; Mattys SL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):544-54. PubMed ID: 19591079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification.
    Arciuli J; Cupples L
    Lang Speech; 2003; 46(Pt 4):353-74. PubMed ID: 15198112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can Lextale-Esp discriminate between groups of highly proficient Catalan-Spanish bilinguals with different language dominances?
    Ferré P; Brysbaert M
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):717-723. PubMed ID: 27004486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence norms for 40,777 Catalan words: An online megastudy of vocabulary size.
    Guasch M; Boada R; Duñabeitia JA; Ferré P
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):3198-3217. PubMed ID: 36085541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative and qualitative differences in the lexical knowledge of monolingual and bilingual children on the LITMUS-CLT task.
    Altman C; Goldstein T; Armon-Lotem S
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2017; 31(11-12):931-954. PubMed ID: 28481641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Categorical phonotactic knowledge filters second language input, but probabilistic phonotactic knowledge can still be acquired.
    Lentz TO; Kager RW
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):387-413. PubMed ID: 26529903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LexCHI: A quick lexical test for estimating language proficiency in Chinese.
    Wen Y; Qiu Y; Leong CXR; van Heuven WJB
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2333-2352. PubMed ID: 37407785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Production of lexical stress in non-native speakers of American English: kinematic correlates of stress and transfer.
    Chakraborty R; Goffman L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):821-35. PubMed ID: 21106699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Knowledge of a second language influences auditory word recognition in the native language.
    Lagrou E; Hartsuiker RJ; Duyck W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):952-65. PubMed ID: 21500950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.