These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34424347)

  • 1. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Izett-Kay ML; Rahmanou P; Cartwright RJ; Price N; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study.
    Izett-Kay ML; Aldabeeb D; Kupelian AS; Cartwright R; Cutner AS; Jackson S; Price N; Vashisht A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Dec; 31(12):2595-2602. PubMed ID: 32620978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing uterine preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh versus laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
    Doğan O; Yassa M; Eren E; Birol İlter P; Tuğ N
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun; 297():120-125. PubMed ID: 38608354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Isenlik BS; Aksoy O; Erol O; Mulayim B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):231-238. PubMed ID: 35737006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic wrap round mesh sacrohysteropexy for the management of apical prolapse.
    Kupelian AS; Vashisht A; Sambandan N; Cutner A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1889-1897. PubMed ID: 27250829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse using validated questionnaires: 2-year prospective study.
    Lone F; Curnow T; Thomas SA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 28687905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vaginal-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vaginal Vault Suspension for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: 12-month Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.
    Cengiz H; Yildiz S; Alay I; Kaya C; Eren E; Iliman DE
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2021; 10(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 33747770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
    van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden A; Veen J; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Housmans S; van Kuijk S; Deprest J; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven H
    BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic Cerclage Sacrohysteropexy: Comparing a Novel Technique for Sacrohysteropexy to Traditional Supracervical Hysterectomy and Sacrocervicopexy.
    Armstrong KL; Modest AM; Rosenblatt PL
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):e315-e320. PubMed ID: 32675629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    van Oudheusden AMJ; Coolen AWM; Hoskam H; Veen J; Bongers MY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):211-223. PubMed ID: 35482083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
    Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Christmann-Schmid C; Haya N; Brown J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD012376. PubMed ID: 27696355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year anatomical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using light-weight Y shaped mesh for post hysterectomy vaginal prolapse.
    Fayyad A; Harris R; Ibrahim S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():139-143. PubMed ID: 35051826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.