193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34424373)
1. Can the introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes increase the longevity of reusable flexible ureteroscopes at a high volume centre?
Ventimiglia E; Smyth N; Doizi S; Jiménez Godínez A; Barghouthy Y; Corrales Acosta MA; Kamkoum H; Somani B; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):251-256. PubMed ID: 34424373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction?
Ventimiglia E; Somani BK; Traxer O
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31815748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: A systematic review.
Ventimiglia E; Godínez AJ; Traxer O; Somani BK
Turk J Urol; 2020 Nov; 46(Supp. 1):S40-S45. PubMed ID: 32877637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.
Al-Balushi K; Martin N; Loubon H; Baboudjian M; Michel F; Sichez PC; Martin T; Di-Crocco E; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Akiki A; Faure A; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Oct; 51(10):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 31317310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-use
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of pre- and post-surgical images of reusable and single use flexible ureteroscopes: a qualitative analysis.
Domenech A; Alliende C; Vivaldi B; Pizzi P
Cent European J Urol; 2021; 74(3):459-463. PubMed ID: 34729238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single use flexible ureteroscopes: a review of current technologies and cost effectiveness analysis.
Talyshinskii A; Gauhar V; Castellani D; Knoll T; Shah K; Wan SP; Somani BK
Curr Opin Urol; 2024 Mar; 34(2):110-115. PubMed ID: 37962372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Use and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes for Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jun DY; Cho KS; Jeong JY; Moon YJ; Kang DH; Jung HD; Lee JY
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Oct; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 36295549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro Comparative Assessment of Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes Using a Standardized Ureteroscopy Training Model.
So WZ; Gauhar V; Chen K; Lu J; Chua WJ; Tiong HY
Urol Int; 2022; 106(12):1279-1286. PubMed ID: 35709703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group.
Talso M; Goumas IK; Kamphuis GM; Dragos L; Tefik T; Traxer O; Somani BK
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Sep; 8(Suppl 4):S418-S425. PubMed ID: 31656747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laser fibre, rather than the stone, may harm the scope: retrospective monocentric analysis of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage.
Ozimek T; Cordes J; Gilbert N; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 31659464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repair Rate and Associated Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Rindorf DK; Tailly T; Kamphuis GM; Larsen S; Somani BK; Traxer O; Koo K
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 37():64-72. PubMed ID: 35128483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Durability of current generation flexible ureteroscopes: the experience from a high-volume centre.
Vaddi CM; Ramakrishna P; Ganesan S; Swamy S; Anandan H; Babu M
Cent European J Urol; 2022; 75(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 35937666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reusable, Single-Use, or Both: A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Flexible Ureterorenoscopes After 983 Cases.
Van Compernolle D; Veys R; Elshout PJ; Beysens M; Van Haute C; De Groote L; Tailly T
J Endourol; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1454-1459. PubMed ID: 33775101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
