165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34425552)
1. A National Survey of EMR Usability: Comparisons between medical and nursing professions in the hospital and primary care sectors in Australia and Finland.
Lloyd S; Long K; Oshni Alvandi A; Di Donato J; Probst Y; Roach J; Bain C
Int J Med Inform; 2021 Oct; 154():104535. PubMed ID: 34425552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical and nursing clinician perspectives on the usability of the hospital electronic medical record: A qualitative analysis.
Lloyd S; Long K; Probst Y; Di Donato J; Oshni Alvandi A; Roach J; Bain C
Health Inf Manag; 2023 Mar; ():18333583231154624. PubMed ID: 36866778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physicians' and nurses' experiences on EHR usability: Comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand.
Kaipio J; Kuusisto A; Hyppönen H; Heponiemi T; Lääveri T
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Feb; 134():104018. PubMed ID: 31835158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving Clinician Decisions and Communication in Critical Care Using Novel Information Technology.
Pamplin J; Nemeth CP; Serio-Melvin ML; Murray SJ; Rule GT; Veinott ES; Veazey SR; Hamilton AJ; Fenrich CA; Laufersweiler DE; Salinas J
Mil Med; 2020 Feb; 185(1-2):e254-e261. PubMed ID: 31271437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usability of information systems: Experiences of outpatient physicians, outpatient nurses, and open care social welfare professionals from three large cross-sectional surveys in Finland.
Viitanen J; Tyllinen M; Tynkkynen E; Lääveri T
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Sep; 165():104836. PubMed ID: 35930926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.
Viitanen J; Hyppönen H; Lääveri T; Vänskä J; Reponen J; Winblad I
Int J Med Inform; 2011 Oct; 80(10):708-25. PubMed ID: 21784701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physicians' Experiences on EHR Usability: A Time Series from 2010, 2014 and 2017.
Kaipio J; Hyppönen H; Lääveri T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 257():194-199. PubMed ID: 30741195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patients' Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-sectional Survey.
Kujala S; Hörhammer I; Väyrynen A; Holmroos M; Nättiaho-Rönnholm M; Hägglund M; Johansen MA
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jun; 24(6):e37438. PubMed ID: 35666563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Newell S; Jordan Z
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation.
Zahabi M; Kaber DB; Swangnetr M
Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):805-34. PubMed ID: 25850118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing the National Usability-Focused Health Information System Scale for Physicians: Validation Study.
Hyppönen H; Kaipio J; Heponiemi T; Lääveri T; Aalto AM; Vänskä J; Elovainio M
J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e12875. PubMed ID: 31099336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usability of electronic nursing record systems: definition and results from an evaluation study in Finland.
Viitanen J; Kuusisto A; Nykänen P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 164():333-8. PubMed ID: 21335733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of Electronic Medical Records in Mental Health Settings: Scoping Review.
Zurynski Y; Ellis LA; Tong HL; Laranjo L; Clay-Williams R; Testa L; Meulenbroeks I; Turton C; Sara G
JMIR Ment Health; 2021 Sep; 8(9):e30564. PubMed ID: 34491208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health Professionals' Perspectives on Electronic Medical Record Infusion and Individual Performance: Model Development and Questionnaire Survey Study.
Chen RF; Hsiao JL
JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Nov; 9(11):e32180. PubMed ID: 34851297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Allied health professionals' experiences and lessons learned in response to a big bang electronic medical record implementation: A prospective observational study.
Feely K; Edbrooke L; Bower W; Mazzone S; Merolli M; Staples J; Martin A
Int J Med Inform; 2023 Aug; 176():105094. PubMed ID: 37220703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation.
Scott IA; Sullivan C; Staib A
Aust Health Rev; 2019 Jul; 43(3):302-313. PubMed ID: 29792259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland.
Hyppönen H; Reponen J; Lääveri T; Kaipio J
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jan; 83(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 24200753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
