These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34425552)

  • 21. End-user participation in health information systems (HIS) development: Physicians' and nurses' experiences.
    Martikainen S; Kaipio J; Lääveri T
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 May; 137():104117. PubMed ID: 32179254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.
    Taylor A; Staruchowicz L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(42 Suppl):1-22. PubMed ID: 27820153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Task-specific usability requirements of electronic medical records systems: Lessons learned from a national survey of end-users.
    Farzandipour M; Meidani Z; Riazi H; Sadeqi Jabali M
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2018 Sep; 43(3):280-299. PubMed ID: 28398097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maternity patients' access to their electronic medical records: use and perspectives of a patient portal.
    Megan Forster M; Dennison K; Callen J; Andrew A; Westbrook JI
    Health Inf Manag; 2015; 44(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 27092464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigation of usability problems of electronic medical record systems in the emergency department.
    Shin GW; Lee Y; Park T; Cho I; Yun MH; Bahn S; Lee JH
    Work; 2022; 72(1):221-238. PubMed ID: 34120924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patients' Experiences of a National Patient Portal and Its Usability: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
    Simola S; Hörhammer I; Xu Y; Bärkås A; Fagerlund AJ; Hagström J; Holmroos M; Hägglund M; Johansen MA; Kane B; Kharko A; Scandurra I; Kujala S
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jun; 25():e45974. PubMed ID: 37389909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.
    Jaspers MW; Peute LW; Lauteslager A; Bakker PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():303-8. PubMed ID: 18487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using a unified usability framework to dramatically improve the usability of an EMR Module.
    Harrington C; Wood R; Breuer J; Pinzon O; Howell R; Pednekar M; Zhu M; Zhang J
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():549-58. PubMed ID: 22195110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. National survey of user-reported usability of electronic medical record software in ophthalmology in Germany.
    Fuhrmann L; Schargus M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 261(11):3325-3334. PubMed ID: 37378879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A nursing focus on EMR usability enhancing documentation of patient outcomes.
    Page CA; Schadler A
    Nurs Clin North Am; 2014 Mar; 49(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 24485189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors Related to Health Informatics Competencies for Nurses-Results of a National Electronic Health Record Survey.
    Kinnunen UM; Heponiemi T; Rajalahti E; Ahonen O; Korhonen T; Hyppönen H
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2019 Aug; 37(8):420-429. PubMed ID: 30741730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics.
    Or C; Tong E; Tan J; Chan S
    J Med Syst; 2018 May; 42(7):121. PubMed ID: 29845400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing usability testing outcomes and functions of six electronic nursing record systems.
    Cho I; Kim E; Choi WH; Staggers N
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Apr; 88():78-85. PubMed ID: 26878766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interventions to improve the use of EMRs in primary health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hamade N; Terry A; Malvankar-Mehta M
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2019 May; 26(1):0. PubMed ID: 31142493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceived Value of Electronic Medical Records in Community Health Services: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Workers in Mainland China.
    Xia Z; Gao W; Wei X; Peng Y; Ran H; Wu H; Liu C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33212868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nurses' Experiences After Implementation of an Organization-Wide Electronic Medical Record: Qualitative Descriptive Study.
    Jedwab RM; Manias E; Hutchinson AM; Dobroff N; Redley B
    JMIR Nurs; 2022 Jul; 5(1):e39596. PubMed ID: 35881417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A longitudinal time and motion study quantifying how implementation of an electronic medical record influences hospital nurses' care delivery.
    Bingham G; Tong E; Poole S; Ross P; Dooley M
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Sep; 153():104537. PubMed ID: 34343955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Realizing electronic medical record benefits: an easy-to-do usability study.
    Harrington L; Porch L; Acosta K; Wilkens K
    J Nurs Adm; 2011; 41(7-8):331-5. PubMed ID: 21799365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Association Between Using a Mobile Version of an Electronic Health Record and the Well-Being of Nurses: Cross-sectional Survey Study.
    Heponiemi T; Kaihlanen AM; Gluschkoff K; Saranto K; Nissinen S; Laukka E; Vehko T
    JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Jul; 9(7):e28729. PubMed ID: 34255704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Usability Study of an Electronic Medical Record From the Nurse Practitioners' Practice: A Qualitative Study Using the Think-Aloud Technique.
    Alshehri AA; Alanazi A
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41603. PubMed ID: 37565107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.