194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34426469)
1. Prognostic value of different lymph node staging methods for node-positive cardia gastric cancer: a register-based retrospective cohort study.
Wang XQ; Bao M; Zhang C
BMJ Open; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e050378. PubMed ID: 34426469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic nomograms combining N classification with ratio-based nodal classifications to predict long-term survival for patients with lung adenocarcinoma after surgery: a SEER population-based study.
Wang S; Yu Y; Xu W; Lv X; Zhang Y; Liu M
BMC Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(1):653. PubMed ID: 34344326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma: Analysis and external validation.
Cai H; Xu T; Zhuang Z; Zhang Y; Gao Y; Liu X; Zhuang J; Yang Y; Guan G
Cancer Med; 2021 Dec; 10(23):8542-8557. PubMed ID: 34796687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The assessment of the optimal number of examined lymph nodes and prognostic models based on lymph nodes for predicting survival outcome in patients with stage N3b gastric cancer.
Guo S; Shang M; Dong Z; Zhang J; Wang Y; Zhao Y
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2021 Apr; 17(2):e117-e124. PubMed ID: 32762113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The relationship between the index of lymph node metastasis and the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients after R0 resection].
Ren H; Wang CF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 42(6):474-479. PubMed ID: 32575943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: A SEER population-based study and external validation.
Li S; Wang Y; Hu X
Cancer Med; 2023 Mar; 12(6):6853-6866. PubMed ID: 36479835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of log odds of positive lymph nodes in node-positive lung squamous cell carcinoma patients after surgery: a SEER population-based study.
Yu Y; Zhang P; Yao R; Wang J; Wang P; Xue X; Xiao J; Wang Z
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2020 Aug; 9(4):1285-1301. PubMed ID: 32953505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 4 lymph node staging systems for the prognostic prediction of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes.
Yang Y; Zheng J; Li Y
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 48(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 34876328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons of different lymph node staging systems for predicting overall survival of node-positive patients with renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database.
Zheng W; Jiang W; Wu Q; Chen J; Zhang Z; Yu S; Guo C
BMJ Open; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e068044. PubMed ID: 37185648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of different lymph node staging schemes in prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastasis.
Jin S; Wang J; Shen Y; Gan H; Xu P; Wei Y; Wei J; Wu J; Wang B; Wang J; Yang C; Zhu Y; Ye D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Jan; 52(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 31552575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a superior prognostic indicator in stage III rectal cancer patients: A retrospective analysis of 17,632 patients in the SEER database.
Huang B; Chen C; Ni M; Mo S; Cai G; Cai S
Int J Surg; 2016 Aug; 32():24-30. PubMed ID: 27321382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy.
Jian-Hui C; Shi-Rong C; Hui W; Si-le C; Jian-Bo X; Er-Tao Z; Chuang-Qi C; Yu-Long H
Tumour Biol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):11105-13. PubMed ID: 26912060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing and validating a prognostic nomogram for ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients: A retrospective comparison of lymph node staging schemes with competing risk analysis.
Li Y; Xiu L; Ma M; Seery S; Lou X; Li K; Wu Y; Liang S; Wu Y; Cui W
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():940601. PubMed ID: 36439411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Log odds of positive lymph nodes may predict survival benefit in patients with node-positive non-small cell lung cancer.
Deng W; Xu T; Wang Y; Xu Y; Yang P; Gomez D; Liao Z
Lung Cancer; 2018 Aug; 122():60-66. PubMed ID: 30032846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic Nomograms Based on Three Lymph Node Classification Systems for Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study and External Validation.
Che K; Wang Y; Wu N; Liu Q; Yang J; Liu B; Wei J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):8937-8949. PubMed ID: 34241748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A survival nomogram model for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer and lymph node metastasis (N1 or N2) based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database and single-center data.
He C; Ni M; Liu J; Teng X; Ke L; Matsuura Y; Okuda K; Sakairi Y; Cheng J; Yu L; Lv W; Hu J
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2024 Mar; 13(3):573-586. PubMed ID: 38601448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantage of log odds of positive lymph nodes in prognostic evaluation of patients with early-onset colon cancer.
Xia HB; Chen C; Jia ZX; Li L; Xu AM
World J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2430-2444. PubMed ID: 38111780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three lymph node classifications for survival prediction in distant metastatic gastric cancer.
Zhou R; Zhang J; Sun H; Liao Y; Liao W
Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():165-171. PubMed ID: 27713088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) for prognostic prediction after gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 7620 patients in China.
Gu P; Deng J; Sun Z; Wang Z; Wang W; Liang H; Xu H; Zhou Z
Surg Today; 2021 Jan; 51(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 32754844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes.
La Torre M; Nigri G; Petrucciani N; Cavallini M; Aurello P; Cosenza G; Balducci G; Ziparo V; Ramacciato G
Pancreatology; 2014; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 25062879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
