These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34426930)

  • 1. The impact of newly self-associated pictorial and letter-based stimuli in attention holding.
    Orellana-Corrales G; Matschke C; Wesslein AK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2729-2743. PubMed ID: 34426930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does Self-Associating a Geometric Shape Immediately Cause Attentional Prioritization?
    Orellana-Corrales G; Matschke C; Wesslein AK
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Nov; 67(6):335-348. PubMed ID: 33661037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli.
    Woźniak M; Knoblich G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):2110-2120. PubMed ID: 30727822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How far can the self be extended? Automatic attention capture is triggered not only by the self-face.
    Żochowska A; Wójcik MJ; Nowicka A
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1279653. PubMed ID: 38023055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-prioritization effect in the attentional blink paradigm: Attention-based or familiarity-based effect?
    Martínez-Pérez V; Sandoval-Lentisco A; Tortajada M; Palmero LB; Campoy G; Fuentes LJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2024 Jan; 117():103607. PubMed ID: 38000192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sticking together? Re-binding previous other-associated stimuli interferes with self-verification but not partner-verification.
    Constable MD; Knoblich G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Oct; 210():103167. PubMed ID: 32853906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of Cardiac Interoception on the Self-Prioritization Effect.
    Honda T; Nakao T
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():825370. PubMed ID: 35903730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No evidence for a common self-bias across cognitive domains.
    Nijhof AD; Shapiro KL; Catmur C; Bird G
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104186. PubMed ID: 31954993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-related shapes can hold the eyes.
    Dalmaso M; Castelli L; Galfano G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2249-2260. PubMed ID: 30852940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.
    Wirth BE; Wentura D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2463-2481. PubMed ID: 32236834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards the self and away from the others: evidence for self-prioritization observed in an approach avoidance task.
    Roy N; Karnick H; Verma A
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1041157. PubMed ID: 37213372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards the boundaries of self-prioritization: Associating the self with asymmetric shapes disrupts the self-prioritization effect.
    Vicovaro M; Dalmaso M; Bertamini M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Sep; 48(9):972-986. PubMed ID: 35816564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Food-related attentional bias. Word versus pictorial stimuli and the importance of stimuli calorific value in the dot probe task.
    Freijy T; Mullan B; Sharpe L
    Appetite; 2014 Dec; 83():202-208. PubMed ID: 25193161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Depersonalization affects self-prioritization of bodily, but not abstract self-related information.
    Woźniak M; McEllin L; Hohwy J; Ciaunica A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Nov; 49(11):1447-1459. PubMed ID: 37870823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The self and a close-other: differences between processing of faces and newly acquired information.
    Żochowska A; Jakuszyk P; Nowicka MM; Nowicka A
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Feb; 33(5):2183-2199. PubMed ID: 35595543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The differential outcomes procedure can overcome self-bias in perceptual matching.
    Fuentes LJ; Sui J; Estévez AF; Humphreys GW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 26160427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-prioritization during stimulus processing is not obligatory.
    Caughey S; Falbén JK; Tsamadi D; Persson LM; Golubickis M; Neil Macrae C
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):503-508. PubMed ID: 31919569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-prioritization in vision, audition, and touch.
    Schäfer S; Wesslein AK; Spence C; Wentura D; Frings C
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2141-50. PubMed ID: 26979440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The automatic and the expected self: separating self- and familiarity biases effects by manipulating stimulus probability.
    Sui J; Sun Y; Peng K; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1176-84. PubMed ID: 24519433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?
    Orellana-Corrales G; Matschke C; Schäfer S; Wesslein AK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jun; 76(6):1379-1390. PubMed ID: 36052697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.