These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34427494)

  • 1. Own-race faces promote integrated audiovisual speech information.
    Ujiie Y; Takahashi K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 May; 75(5):924-935. PubMed ID: 34427494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The other-race effect on the McGurk effect in infancy.
    Ujiie Y; Kanazawa S; Yamaguchi MK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2924-2936. PubMed ID: 34386882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study.
    Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial identity and facial speech processing: familiar faces and voices in the McGurk effect.
    Walker S; Bruce V; O'Malley C
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1124-33. PubMed ID: 8539088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can you McGurk yourself? Self-face and self-voice in audiovisual speech.
    Aruffo C; Shore DI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Feb; 19(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 22033983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serial dependence of facial identity for own- and other-race faces.
    Turbett K; Jeffery L; Bell J; Digges A; Zheng Y; Hsiao J; Palermo R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Sep; 75(9):1711-1726. PubMed ID: 34714182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Other-Race-Effect on Audiovisual Speech Integration in Infants: A NIRS Study.
    Ujiie Y; Kanazawa S; Yamaguchi MK
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():971. PubMed ID: 32499746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Macaluso E; Soto-Faraco S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5691-5705. PubMed ID: 28792094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A value-driven McGurk effect: Value-associated faces enhance the influence of visual information on audiovisual speech perception and its eye movement pattern.
    Luo X; Kang G; Guo Y; Yu X; Zhou X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1928-1941. PubMed ID: 31898072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weak observer-level correlation and strong stimulus-level correlation between the McGurk effect and audiovisual speech-in-noise: A causal inference explanation.
    Magnotti JF; Dzeda KB; Wegner-Clemens K; Rennig J; Beauchamp MS
    Cortex; 2020 Dec; 133():371-383. PubMed ID: 33221701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Paying" attention to audiovisual speech: Do incongruent stimuli incur greater costs?
    Brown VA; Strand JF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1743-1756. PubMed ID: 31197661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attending to identity cues reduces the own-age but not the own-race recognition advantage.
    Proietti V; Laurence S; Matthews CM; Zhou X; Mondloch CJ
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():184-191. PubMed ID: 29454885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overcoming the other-race effect in infancy with multisensory redundancy: 10-12-month-olds discriminate dynamic other-race faces producing speech.
    Minar NJ; Lewkowicz DJ
    Dev Sci; 2018 Jul; 21(4):e12604. PubMed ID: 28944541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The social-encoding benefit in face recognition is generalized to other-race faces.
    Schwartz L; Cohen M; Xu S; Liu J; Yovel G
    Br J Psychol; 2023 May; 114 Suppl 1():213-229. PubMed ID: 36018320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences and the effect of face configuration information in the McGurk effect.
    Ujiie Y; Asai T; Wakabayashi A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Apr; 236(4):973-984. PubMed ID: 29383400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using McGurk effect to detect speech-perceptional abnormalities in refractory epilepsy.
    Keni RR; Radhakrishnan A
    Epilepsy Behav; 2021 Jan; 114(Pt A):107600. PubMed ID: 33248941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.
    Getz LM; Toscano JC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2583-2598. PubMed ID: 33884572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.