148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34428671)
1. Searching CODIS with binary conversions of STRmix interpretations.
Myers S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102569. PubMed ID: 34428671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. STRmix
Noël S; Noël J; Granger D; Lefebvre JF; Séguin D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():24-31. PubMed ID: 30947115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis.
Huffman K; Ballantyne J
Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.
Coble MD; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():219-224. PubMed ID: 30458407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.
Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Gittelson S; Moretti TR; Onorato AJ; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Taylor DA
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 30132900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.
Bright JA; Taylor D; McGovern C; Cooper S; Russell L; Abarno D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():226-239. PubMed ID: 27235797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Compound and Conditioned Likelihood Ratio Behavior within a Probabilistic Genotyping Context.
Duke K; Cuenca D; Myers S; Wallin J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36360267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST.
Bright JA; Richards R; Kruijver M; Kelly H; McGovern C; Magee A; McWhorter A; Ciecko A; Peck B; Baumgartner C; Buettner C; McWilliams S; McKenna C; Gallacher C; Mallinder B; Wright D; Johnson D; Catella D; Lien E; O'Connor C; Duncan G; Bundy J; Echard J; Lowe J; Stewart J; Corrado K; Gentile S; Kaplan M; Hassler M; McDonald N; Hulme P; Oefelein RH; Montpetit S; Strong M; Noël S; Malsom S; Myers S; Welti S; Moretti T; McMahon T; Grill T; Kalafut T; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Beamer V; Taylor DA; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():11-24. PubMed ID: 29367014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™.
Thompson WC
J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 36847295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the LUS in sequence allele designations to facilitate probabilistic genotyping of NGS-based STR typing results.
Just RS; Irwin JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():197-205. PubMed ID: 29525576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-cell investigative genetics: Single-cell data produces genotype distributions concentrated at the true genotype across all mixture complexities.
Grgicak CM; Bhembe Q; Slooten K; Sheth NC; Duffy KR; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():103000. PubMed ID: 38199167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using big data from probabilistic genotyping to solve crime.
Taylor D; Abarno D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Mar; 57():102631. PubMed ID: 34861631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
Riman S; Iyer H; Vallone PM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256714. PubMed ID: 34534241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparisons of familial DNA database searching strategies.
Ge J; Chakraborty R; Eisenberg A; Budowle B
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1448-56. PubMed ID: 21827463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of a method for weighting a range in the number of contributors in probabilistic genotyping.
McGovern C; Cheng K; Kelly H; Ciecko A; Taylor D; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102352. PubMed ID: 32707473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic evaluation of STRmix™ performance on degraded DNA profile data.
Duke KR; Myers SP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102174. PubMed ID: 31707114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
