These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34430409)

  • 1. The validity and reliability of computer-aided semen analyzers in performing semen analysis: a systematic review.
    Finelli R; Leisegang K; Tumallapalli S; Henkel R; Agarwal A
    Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Jul; 10(7):3069-3079. PubMed ID: 34430409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?
    Talarczyk-Desole J; Berger A; Taszarek-Hauke G; Hauke J; Pawelczyk L; Jedrzejczak P
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 28326513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.
    Lammers J; Splingart C; Barrière P; Jean M; Fréour T
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Jan; 31(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 24242989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa.
    Contri A; Valorz C; Faustini M; Wegher L; Carluccio A
    Theriogenology; 2010 Aug; 74(3):424-35. PubMed ID: 20451996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of computer-aided semen analysis: comparison of five different systems used in a practical workshop.
    Holt W; Watson P; Curry M; Holt C
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Dec; 62(6):1277-82. PubMed ID: 7958000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC variables with the computer-aided sperm analysis estimates.
    Suzuki T; Shibahara H; Tsunoda H; Hirano Y; Taneichi A; Obara H; Takamizawa S; Sato I
    Int J Androl; 2002 Feb; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11869377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manual versus computer-automated semen analysis.
    Köse M; Sokmensuer LK; Demir A; Bozdag G; Gunalp S
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(6):662-4. PubMed ID: 25551959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments.
    Amann RP; Waberski D
    Theriogenology; 2014 Jan; 81(1):5-17.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24274405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a smartphone-based, computer-assisted sperm analysis system compared with laboratory-based manual microscopic semen analysis and computer-assisted semen analysis.
    Cheon WH; Park HJ; Park MJ; Lim MY; Park JH; Kang BJ; Park NC
    Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Sep; 60(5):380-387. PubMed ID: 31501801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of commercially available chamber slides for computer-aided analysis of human sperm.
    Dardmeh F; Heidari M; Alipour H
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2021 Apr; 67(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33375858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of adjusting settings within a Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) system on bovine sperm motility and morphology results.
    O'Meara C; Henrotte E; Kupisiewicz K; Latour C; Broekhuijse M; Camus A; Gavin-Plagne L; Sellem E
    Anim Reprod; 2022; 19(1):e20210077. PubMed ID: 35281996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a portable device for assessment of motility in stallion semen.
    Buss T; Aurich J; Aurich C
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Mar; 54(3):514-519. PubMed ID: 30592335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) with IDENT stain to determine sperm concentration.
    Zinaman MJ; Uhler ML; Vertuno E; Fisher SG; Clegg ED
    J Androl; 1996; 17(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 8792219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided sperm analysis: past, present and future.
    Lu JC; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Andrologia; 2014 May; 46(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 23550608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
    Akashi T; Mizuno I; Okumura A; Fuse H
    Arch Androl; 2005; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16214729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The future of computer-aided sperm analysis.
    Mortimer ST; van der Horst G; Mortimer D
    Asian J Androl; 2015; 17(4):545-53. PubMed ID: 25926614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the Sperm Class Analyser (SCA) CASA-Mot system for human sperm motility analysis reduce imprecision and operator subjectivity and improve semen analysis?
    Dearing C; Jayasena C; Lindsay K
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Jul; 24(3):208-218. PubMed ID: 31056980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team.
    Larsen L; Scheike T; Jensen TK; Bonde JP; Ernst E; Hjollund NH; Zhou Y; Skakkebaek NE; Giwercman A
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Jul; 15(7):1562-7. PubMed ID: 10875866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.