These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34431181)
1. Perioperative adverse events and functional outcomes following open and robot-assisted prostatectomy in patients over age 70. Sancı A; Özkaya MF; Oguz ES; Gokce Mİ; Süer E; Gülpinar O; Baltacı S; Turkolmez K Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Nov; 75(11):e14754. PubMed ID: 34431181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide. Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adequacy of lymphadenectomy among men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Cooperberg MR; Kane CJ; Cowan JE; Carroll PR BJU Int; 2010 Jan; 105(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 19549119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Acute and Chronic Surgical Complications Following Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy Among Men in Taiwan. Wu SY; Chang CL; Chen CI; Huang CC JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2120156. PubMed ID: 34432012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up. Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients. Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies]. Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective assessment of residual nerve tissues in radical prostatectomy specimens by immunohistochemical staining of neuronal nitric oxide synthase-positive nerves and its impact on postoperative erectile function. Miyake H; Behnsawy HM; Hinata N; Fujisawa M Urology; 2014 Dec; 84(6):1395-401. PubMed ID: 25432827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. Kim SC; Song C; Kim W; Kang T; Park J; Jeong IG; Lee S; Cho YM; Ahn H Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21612859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer? Punnen S; Meng MV; Cooperberg MR; Greene KL; Cowan JE; Carroll PR BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E314-20. PubMed ID: 23451984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy? Marien TP; Lepor H BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. Krambeck AE; DiMarco DS; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Myers RP; Blute ML; Gettman MT BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 18778350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Traboulsi SL; Nguyen DD; Zakaria AS; Law KW; Shahine H; Meskawi M; Negrean C; Karakiewicz PI; Hakim AE; Zorn KC World J Urol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2791-2798. PubMed ID: 32034499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Ficarra V; Novara G; Rosen RC; Artibani W; Carroll PR; Costello A; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel VR; Stolzenburg JU; Van der Poel H; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Mottrie A Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 22749852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]