162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34431255)
21. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhao Y; Hang B; Xiong GW; Zhang XW
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 28300465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
Chen C; Guo J; Liu P; Li Z; Jiang H; Zhu Q; Bin X; Lang J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1516-1526. PubMed ID: 33527615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
Zhang N; Jin X; Yang W; Gu C; Li L; Xu J; Tang Q; Fan W; Meng Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):197. PubMed ID: 37403056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Urinary and anal dysfunction after laparoscopic versus laparotomic radical hysterectomy.
Laterza RM; Salvatore S; Ghezzi F; Serati M; Umek W; Koelbl H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():11-6. PubMed ID: 26313524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy evaluation of vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective case series study.
Wang H; Li D; Wang C; Wang X; Yu M; Zhang X; Li L; Zeng Q; Long Z; Zheng W; Liu G; Wang D
Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):124. PubMed ID: 35282041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Is Not Superior to Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Perioperative Urologic Complications: A Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies.
Hwang JH; Kim BW; Kim SR; Kim JH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 31315060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Survival Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Hwang JH; Kim BW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):971-981.e3. PubMed ID: 33321255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Lu A; Zhao H; Zhan X; Duan H; Li P; Zhao W; Yao J; Li D; Jiang H; Liu M; Bin X; Lang J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Feb; 305(2):449-458. PubMed ID: 34406459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Luo C; Liu M; Li X
BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.
Wenzel HHB; Smolders RGV; Beltman JJ; Lambrechts S; Trum HW; Yigit R; Zusterzeel PLM; Zweemer RP; Mom CH; Bekkers RLM; Lemmens VEPP; Nijman HW; Van der Aa MA
Eur J Cancer; 2020 Jul; 133():14-21. PubMed ID: 32422504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shazly SA; Murad MH; Dowdy SC; Gostout BS; Famuyide AO
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):457-71. PubMed ID: 26056752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ciravolo G; Volpi E; Uccella S; Rampinelli F; Bergamini V
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Sep; 106(3):502-6. PubMed ID: 17553554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The long-term urinary dysfunction after type C2 radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer.
Huang L; He Y; Gong Y
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):514-517. PubMed ID: 34169784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Impaction of Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy for Lymphovascular Space Invasion of Early Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Huang W; Wang Y; Yang F; Luo N; Ai G; Wu Y; Cheng Z
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2022; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 35310130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer.
Roy M; Plante M; Renaud MC; Têtu B
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 8812529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of the surgical routes and learning curve of radical hysterectomy on the survival outcomes in stage IB cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Liu Y; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Lang J
Int J Surg; 2019 Aug; 68():72-77. PubMed ID: 31220631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
