These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34431421)

  • 1. Pooled incidence of continuation and pregnancy rates of four contraceptive methods in young women: a meta-analysis.
    Farah D; Andrade TRM; Di Bella ZIKJ; Girão MJBC; Fonseca MCM
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2022 Apr; 27(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 34431421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.
    Krashin J; Tang JH; Mody S; Lopez LM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; 2015(8):CD009805. PubMed ID: 26280888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
    French R; Van Vliet H; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Helmerhorst F; Guillebaud J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(3):CD001776. PubMed ID: 15266453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimated disability-adjusted life years averted by long-term provision of long acting contraceptive methods in a Brazilian clinic.
    Bahamondes L; Bottura BF; Bahamondes MV; Gonçalves MP; Correia VM; Espejo-Arce X; Sousa MH; Monteiro I; Fernandes A
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Oct; 29(10):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25085802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review on clinical effectiveness, side-effect profile and meta-analysis on continuation rate of etonogestrel contraceptive implant.
    Moray KV; Chaurasia H; Sachin O; Joshi B
    Reprod Health; 2021 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 33407632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs), versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
    French R; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Guillebaud J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD001776. PubMed ID: 11406007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls.
    Bahamondes L; Brache V; Meirik O; Ali M; Habib N; Landoulsi S;
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2527-38. PubMed ID: 26409014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two year continuation rates of contraceptive methods in France: a cohort study from the French national health insurance database.
    Agostini A; Godard C; Laurendeau C; Benmahmoud Zoubir A; Lafuma A; Lévy-Bachelot L; Gourmelen J; Linet T
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2018 Dec; 23(6):421-426. PubMed ID: 30499732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.
    Tang JH; Lopez LM; Mody S; Grimes DA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11():CD009805. PubMed ID: 23152281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate postabortion initiation of levonorgestrel implants reduces the incidence of births and abortions at 2 years and beyond.
    Rose SB; Garrett SM; Stanley J
    Contraception; 2015 Jul; 92(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25818594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system for post-abortion contraception.
    Bilgehan F; Dilbaz B; Karadag B; Deveci CD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1426-32. PubMed ID: 26180028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's satisfaction with and ongoing use of hormonal long-acting methods compared to the oral contraceptive pill: Findings from an Australian general practice cluster randomised trial (ACCORd).
    Black KI; McGeechan K; Watson CJ; Lucke J; Taft A; McNamee K; Haas M; Peipert JF; Mazza D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jun; 61(3):448-453. PubMed ID: 33599984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multicentre, open-label, randomised phase III study comparing a new levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive system (LNG-IUS 8) with combined oral contraception in young women of reproductive age.
    Borgatta L; Buhling KJ; Rybowski S; Roth K; Rosen K
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Oct; 21(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 27494570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system: cohort study to assess satisfaction in a postpartum population in Kenya.
    Hubacher D; Masaba R; Manduku CK; Chen M; Veena V
    Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 25601351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-acting reversible contraception in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Diedrich JT; Klein DA; Peipert JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):364.e1-364.e12. PubMed ID: 28038902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives.
    Modesto W; Bahamondes MV; Bahamondes L
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 24812309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety and continued use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system as compared with the copper intrauterine device among women living with HIV in South Africa: A randomized controlled trial.
    Todd CS; Jones HE; Langwenya N; Hoover DR; Chen PL; Petro G; Myer L
    PLoS Med; 2020 May; 17(5):e1003110. PubMed ID: 32442189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
    Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.
    Jatlaoui TC; Riley HEM; Curtis KM
    Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 27771475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
    Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
    Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.