183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34432671)
1. Development and Critical Evaluation of a Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measure Sensitive to Binaural Hearing in Adults: The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality-of-Life System.
Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT; Goman AM
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):379-397. PubMed ID: 34432671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Rasch Analysis to Assess and Improve the Measurement Properties of a Questionnaire With Few Items: The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality of Life (YBHRQL) Questionnaire.
Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1526-1539. PubMed ID: 37358331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of EQ-5D-3L, HUI2, HUI3, and SF-6D to changes in speech reception and tinnitus associated with cochlear implantation.
Summerfield AQ; Barton GR;
Qual Life Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1145-1154. PubMed ID: 30484121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Kerber S; Seeber BU
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement between health utility instruments in cochlear implantation.
Ramakers GG; Smulders YE; van Zon A; Kraaijenga VJ; Stegeman I; Van Zanten GA; Grolman W
Clin Otolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 41(6):737-743. PubMed ID: 26868059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Everyday Listening Performance of Children Before and After Receiving a Second Cochlear Implant: Results Using the Parent Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
Galvin KL; Mok M
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 26418045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of the psychometric properties of generic utility measures in multiple sclerosis.
Kuspinar A; Mayo NE
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Aug; 32(8):759-73. PubMed ID: 24846760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.
Longworth L; Yang Y; Young T; Mulhern B; Hernández Alava M; Mukuria C; Rowen D; Tosh J; Tsuchiya A; Evans P; Devianee Keetharuth A; Brazier J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(9):1-224. PubMed ID: 24524660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Ching TY; Incerti P; Hill M
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 14770014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users 65 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
Wick CC; Kallogjeri D; McJunkin JL; Durakovic N; Holden LK; Herzog JA; Firszt JB; Buchman CA;
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct; 146(10):925-932. PubMed ID: 32857114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
Ma N; Morris S; Kitterick PT
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.
Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Arcaroli J; Sammeth C
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):714-31. PubMed ID: 17086081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical Factors for Binaural Hearing in Children with Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: First Implant Performance and Inter-Implant Interval.
Jang JH; Roh JM; Choo OS; Kim YJ; Kim H; Park HY; Choung YH
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(4):174-182. PubMed ID: 31394542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of unilateral input and mode of hearing in the better ear: self-reported performance using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale.
Dwyer NY; Firszt JB; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 24084062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From hearing with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (CI/HA) to hearing with two cochlear implants (CI/CI): a within-subject design comparison.
Luntz M; Egra-Dagan D; Attias J; Yehudai N; Most T; Shpak T
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1682-90. PubMed ID: 25275862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants? Ask the Patient.
Gifford RH; Dorman MF
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):501-516. PubMed ID: 30285977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors contributing to clinically important health utility gains in cochlear implant recipients.
Müller L; Graham P; Kaur J; Wyss J; Greenham P; James CJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 278(12):4723-4731. PubMed ID: 33452623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
