These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34433347)

  • 1. The role of disgust as an emotional barrier to colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Scaglioni G; Guidetti M; Cavazza N
    Psychol Health; 2023 Mar; 38(3):389-408. PubMed ID: 34433347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of the emotion of disgust as an affective barrier to intention to screen for colorectal cancer.
    Davis M; Oaten M; Occhipinti S; Chambers SK; Stevenson RJ
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 Jul; 26(4):. PubMed ID: 27704647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychosocial Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Intention: An Experiment on the Invitation Letter.
    Scaglioni G; Chiereghin A; Bazzani C; Mezzetti F; Cavazza N
    Int J Behav Med; 2023 Dec; 30(6):867-877. PubMed ID: 36515798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotional predictors of bowel screening: the avoidance-promoting role of fear, embarrassment, and disgust.
    Reynolds LM; Bissett IP; Consedine NS
    BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):518. PubMed ID: 29720112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disgust and behavioral avoidance in colorectal cancer screening and treatment: a systematic review and research agenda.
    Reynolds LM; Consedine NS; Pizarro DA; Bissett IP
    Cancer Nurs; 2013; 36(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 23047793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotional Barriers to Bowel Screening in Italy: Scale psychometric properties and effects on screening attendance.
    Scaglioni G; Cavazza N
    Psychooncology; 2022 Jan; 31(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 34331357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trait and state disgust: an experimental investigation of disgust and avoidance in colorectal cancer decision scenarios.
    Reynolds LM; McCambridge SA; Bissett IP; Consedine NS
    Health Psychol; 2014 Dec; 33(12):1495-506. PubMed ID: 24447190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facing the Emotional Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening. The Roles of Reappraisal and Situation Selection.
    Scaglioni G; Capasso M; Bianchi M; Caso D; Cavazza N
    Int J Behav Med; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38637471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies for increasing participation in mail-out colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Goodwin BC; Ireland MJ; March S; Myers L; Crawford-Williams F; Chambers SK; Aitken JF; Dunn J
    Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):257. PubMed ID: 31685010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is it disgusting or am I just easily disgusted? The relation between situational disgust, dispositional disgust, and colonoscopy intentions.
    Klasko-Foster LB; Keller MM; Kiviniemi MT
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2020 Sep; 29(5):e13244. PubMed ID: 32596994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Didactic and narrative persuasion: An experiment to promote colorectal cancer screening.
    Scaglioni G; Chiereghin A; Squillace L; De Frenza F; Kregel JM; Bazzani C; Mezzetti F; Cavazza N
    Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2024 May; 16(2):497-514. PubMed ID: 37840199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Intention and Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening after a Brief Health Education Program in a Malaysian Primary Care Setting: A Population-Based Study.
    Chan MW; Chean KY; Kader Maideen SF; Kow FP
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Nov; 22(11):3475-3482. PubMed ID: 34837902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of supplementary narrative-based information on colorectal cancer screening beliefs and intention.
    McGregor LM; von Wagner C; Vart G; Yuen WC; Raine R; Wardle J; Robb KA
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Mar; 15():162. PubMed ID: 25884168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How effective are digital technology-based interventions at promoting colorectal cancer screening uptake in average-risk populations? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Lau J; Ng A; Wong GJ; Siew KY; Tan JKH; Pang Y; Tan KK
    Prev Med; 2022 Nov; 164():107343. PubMed ID: 36368343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.
    Dressler J; Johnsen AT; Madsen LJ; Rasmussen M; Jorgensen LN
    Public Health; 2021 Jan; 190():67-74. PubMed ID: 33360029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Atkinson TM; Salz T; Touza KK; Li Y; Hay JL
    J Behav Med; 2015 Dec; 38(6):837-50. PubMed ID: 26280755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Elmunzer BJ; Hayward RA; Schoenfeld PS; Saini SD; Deshpande A; Waljee AK
    PLoS Med; 2012; 9(12):e1001352. PubMed ID: 23226108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Promoting colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of interventions to increase uptake.
    Tsipa A; O'Connor DB; Branley-Bell D; Day F; Hall LH; Sykes-Muskett B; Wilding S; Taylor N; Conner M
    Health Psychol Rev; 2021 Sep; 15(3):371-394. PubMed ID: 32401175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.