293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34435284)
21. How to Select Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients Still Suitable for Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: a Propensity-Matched Study.
Pedone Anchora L; Turco LC; Bizzarri N; Capozzi VA; Lombisani A; Chiantera V; De Felice F; Gallotta V; Cosentino F; Fagotti A; Ferrandina G; Scambia G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 31898100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Minimal-invasive or open approach for surgery of early cervical cancer: the treatment center matters.
Gennari P; Gerken M; Mészáros J; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Ortmann O; Eggemann H; Ignatov A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Aug; 304(2):503-510. PubMed ID: 33483846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: A single-center retrospective study.
Yeon Choi H; Park JW
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(17):e33702. PubMed ID: 37115056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Prognosis between Minimally Invasive and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Tanaka T; Ueda S; Miyamoto S; Hashida S; Terada S; Konishi H; Kogata Y; Taniguchi K; Komura K; Ohmichi M
Curr Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(4):2272-2283. PubMed ID: 35448159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Minimally invasive surgery and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
Yu Y; Deng T; Gu S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 May; 157(2):255-264. PubMed ID: 34165795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A retrospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in Japan during the early years following its introduction: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG1081S).
Kobayashi E; Kanao H; Takekuma M; Nishio S; Kojima-Chiba A; Tozawa A; Yamaguchi S; Takeshima N; Nakatani E; Mikami M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Feb; 26(2):417-428. PubMed ID: 33433752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tailored radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Sakuragi N; Kaneuchi M; Kato T; Shimada C; Todo Y; Ihira K; Nozaki A; Umazume T; Konno Y; Mitamura T; Kobayashi N; Murakami G; Watari H
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1136-1142. PubMed ID: 32522774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size? (MISAFE): Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA-1003).
Kong TW; Kim J; Son JH; Lee AJ; Yang EJ; Shim SH; Kim NK; Kim Y; Suh DH; Hwang DW; Park SJ; Kim HS; Lee YY; Yoo JG; Lee SJ; Chang SJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 176():122-129. PubMed ID: 37515926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.
Uppal S; Gehrig PA; Peng K; Bixel KL; Matsuo K; Vetter MH; Davidson BA; Cisa MP; Lees BF; Brunette LL; Tucker K; Stuart Staley A; Gotlieb WH; Holloway RW; Essel KG; Holman LL; Goldfeld E; Olawaiye A; Rose SL
J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(10):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 32031867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multivariate analysis of histopathologic prognostic factors for invasive cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.
Takeda N; Sakuragi N; Takeda M; Okamoto K; Kuwabara M; Negishi H; Oikawa M; Yamamoto R; Yamada H; Fujimoto S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Dec; 81(12):1144-51. PubMed ID: 12519111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Patterns of recurrence in FIGO stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer: Comparison between minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy.
Corrado G; Anchora LP; Bruni S; Sperduti I; Certelli C; Chiofalo B; Giannini A; D'Oria O; Bizzarri N; Legge F; Cosentino F; Turco LC; Vizza E; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Nov; 49(11):107047. PubMed ID: 37862783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study.
Baiocchi G; Ribeiro R; Dos Reis R; Falcao DF; Lopes A; Costa RLR; Pinto GLS; Vieira M; Kumagai LY; Faloppa CC; Mantoan H; Badiglian-Filho L; Tsunoda AT; Foiato TF; Andrade CEMC; Palmeira LO; Gonçalves BT; Zanvettor PH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):1151-1160. PubMed ID: 34545531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
