These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34435351)

  • 1. Contrasting effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on size perception.
    Han Y; Tan Z; Zhuang H; Qian J
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Feb; 113(1):153-175. PubMed ID: 34435351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Laeng B; Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20441992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Both dorsal and ventral attention network nodes are implicated in exogenously driven visuospatial anticipation.
    Ahrens MM; Veniero D; Freund IM; Harvey M; Thut G
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():168-181. PubMed ID: 30981955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on second-order texture contrast sensitivity.
    Barbot A; Landy MS; Carrasco M
    J Vis; 2012 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 22895879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Matching cue size and task properties in exogenous attention.
    Burnett KE; d'Avossa G; Sapir A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2363-75. PubMed ID: 23574543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns.
    Anton-Erxleben K; Henrich C; Treue S
    J Vis; 2007 Aug; 7(11):5.1-9. PubMed ID: 17997660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different attentional focus sizes modulate the size-eccentricity effect.
    Wu X; Liu M; Wang A; Zhang M
    Psych J; 2023 Feb; 12(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 36167945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential effects of vestibular processing on orienting exogenous and endogenous covert visual attention.
    Kaliuzhna M; Serino A; Berger S; Blanke O
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 237(2):401-410. PubMed ID: 30421244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous cueing in multi-stream RSVP: implications for theories of attentional blink.
    Zhang D; Shao L; Zhou X; Martens S
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Sep; 205(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 20686889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing the generality of the zoom-lens model: Evidence for visual-pathway specific effects of attended-region size on perception.
    Goodhew SC; Lawrence RK; Edwards M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1147-1164. PubMed ID: 28303479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation.
    Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital-parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention.
    Kasten FH; Wendeln T; Stecher HI; Herrmann CS
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12270. PubMed ID: 32703961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm.
    Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 17469972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation of Neuronal Responses by Exogenous Attention in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex.
    Wang F; Chen M; Yan Y; Zhaoping L; Li W
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(39):13419-29. PubMed ID: 26424888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting.
    Goldsmith M; Yeari M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):897-918. PubMed ID: 14585013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feature integration and spatial attention: common processes for endogenous and exogenous orienting.
    Henderickx D; Maetens K; Soetens E
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):239-54. PubMed ID: 19639338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exogenous and endogenous spatial attention effects on visuospatial working memory.
    Botta F; Santangelo V; Raffone A; Lupiáñez J; Belardinelli MO
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1590-602. PubMed ID: 20112160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial orienting around the fovea: exogenous and endogenous cueing effects.
    Yang T; Zhang J; Bao Y
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():137-41. PubMed ID: 26232192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.