These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34437709)

  • 1. Conceptualizing and quantifying body condition using structural equation modelling: A user guide.
    Frauendorf M; Allen AM; Verhulst S; Jongejans E; Ens BJ; van der Kolk HJ; de Kroon H; Nienhuis J; van de Pol M
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2478-2496. PubMed ID: 34437709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative evaluation of factor- and component-based structural equation modelling approaches under (in)correct construct representations.
    Cho G; Sarstedt M; Hwang H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 May; 75(2):220-251. PubMed ID: 34661902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic structural equation modelling provides insights into the multivariate genetic architecture of complex traits.
    Grotzinger AD; Rhemtulla M; de Vlaming R; Ritchie SJ; Mallard TT; Hill WD; Ip HF; Marioni RE; McIntosh AM; Deary IJ; Koellinger PD; Harden KP; Nivard MG; Tucker-Drob EM
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 May; 3(5):513-525. PubMed ID: 30962613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond path diagrams: Enhancing applied structural equation modeling research through data visualization.
    Hallgren KA; McCabe CJ; King KM; Atkins DC
    Addict Behav; 2019 Jul; 94():74-82. PubMed ID: 30219251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structural Equation Modeling.
    Stein CM; Morris NJ; Hall NB; Nock NL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():557-580. PubMed ID: 28980265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using structural equation modeling for network meta-analysis.
    Tu YK; Wu YC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):104. PubMed ID: 28709406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A framework for power analysis using a structural equation modelling procedure.
    Miles J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Dec; 3():27. PubMed ID: 14670092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Social Media Mining and PLS-SEM to Examine the Causal Relationship between Public Environmental Concerns and Adaptation Strategies.
    Yang CL; Huang CY; Hsiao YH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34063459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applications of meta-analytic structural equation modelling in health psychology: examples, issues, and recommendations.
    Cheung MW; Hong RY
    Health Psychol Rev; 2017 Sep; 11(3):265-279. PubMed ID: 28625100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural equation modeling.
    Stein CM; Morris NJ; Nock NL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():495-512. PubMed ID: 22307716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The adoption of cryptocurrency as a disruptive force: Deep learning-based dual stage structural equation modelling and artificial neural network analysis.
    Abbasi GA; Tiew LY; Tang J; Goh YN; Thurasamy R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247582. PubMed ID: 33684120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review of structural equation modelling in nursing research.
    Sharif SP; Mostafiz I; Guptan V
    Nurse Res; 2019 Sep; 26(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 30207432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of several approaches for controlling measurement error in small samples.
    Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):352-370. PubMed ID: 29781637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. R-squared change in structural equation models with latent variables and missing data.
    Hayes T
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2127-2157. PubMed ID: 33782902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of Path Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling in Nutrition and Dietetics.
    Harris JE; Gleason PM
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2022 Nov; 122(11):2023-2035. PubMed ID: 35863617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GW-SEM 2.0: Efficient, Flexible, and Accessible Multivariate GWAS.
    Pritikin JN; Neale MC; Prom-Wormley EC; Clark SL; Verhulst B
    Behav Genet; 2021 May; 51(3):343-357. PubMed ID: 33604756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which method is more powerful in testing the relationship of theoretical constructs? A meta comparison of structural equation modeling and path analysis with weighted composites.
    Deng L; Yuan KH
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1460-1479. PubMed ID: 35653013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.