656 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34437864)
1. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 30-Day Readmission After Same-Day Compared With Next-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 135(6):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 32459424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 30-Day unanticipated healthcare encounters after prolapse surgery: impact of same day discharge.
Romanova AL; Carter-Brooks C; Ruppert KM; Zyczynski HM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):482.e1-482.e8. PubMed ID: 31733206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Richter HE; Sridhar A; Nager CW; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Rardin C; Visco A; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
Linder BJ; Gershman B; Bews KA; Glasgow AE; Occhino JA
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longitudinal Reoperation Risk After Apical Prolapse Procedures in Women Aged 65 Years and Older.
Berger AA; Bretschneider CE; Gregory WT; Sung V
Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 143(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 38227947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Same-Day Discharge on 30-Day Readmission Rates in Women Aged 65 Years and Older Undergoing Minimally Invasive Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
Berger AA; Bretschneider CE; Gregory WT; Sung V
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jul; 142(1):170-177. PubMed ID: 37290098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The incidence of transfusion and associated risk factors in pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Pandya LK; Lynch CD; Hundley AF; Nekkanti S; Hudson CO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):612.e1-612.e8. PubMed ID: 28709582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of a urogynecology-specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.
Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Ruppert KM; Romanova AL; Zyczynski HM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):495.e1-495.e10. PubMed ID: 29913175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readmission and Prolapse Recurrence After Abdominal and Vaginal Apical Suspensions in Older Women.
Sanses TVD; Hanley JM; Zhang P; Richter HE; Gambert SR; Saigal CS
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 27824746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors of lower urinary tract injury with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Welch EK; Dengler KL; Guirguis M; Strauchon C; Olsen C; Von Pechmann W
AJOG Glob Rep; 2022 Feb; 2(1):100035. PubMed ID: 36274961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse.
Boyd BAJ; Winkelman WD; Mishra K; Vittinghoff E; Jacoby VL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):405.e1-405.e7. PubMed ID: 33984303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
