These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34438145)
1. Integrating the inter- and intra-annual dynamic features of capital into environmental footprint assessment: Revisiting China's greenhouse gas footprints, 1995-2015. Wu Z; Wang M; Ye Q Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 801():149629. PubMed ID: 34438145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linking the Environmental Pressures of China's Capital Development to Global Final Consumption of the Past Decades and into the Future. Ye Q; Hertwich EG; Krol MS; Font Vivanco D; Lounsbury AW; Zheng X; Hoekstra AY; Wang Y; Wang R Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(9):6421-6429. PubMed ID: 33826846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The greenhouse gas footprints of China's food production and consumption (1987-2017). Zhang H; Xu Y; Lahr ML J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 301():113934. PubMed ID: 34731952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. China's Trade of Agricultural Products Drives Substantial Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Meng Z; Guo J; Yan K; Yang Z; Li B; Zhang B; Chen B Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carbon footprint and water footprint in China: Similarities and differences. Wang Q; Ge S Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 739():140070. PubMed ID: 32758954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research on the relationship between China's greenhouse gas emissions and industrial structure and economic growth from the perspective of energy consumption. Zhang Z; Ma X; Lian X; Guo Y; Song Y; Chang B; Luo L Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Nov; 27(33):41839-41855. PubMed ID: 32700267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The carbon footprint of the Chinese health-care system: an environmentally extended input-output and structural path analysis study. Wu R Lancet Planet Health; 2019 Oct; 3(10):e413-e419. PubMed ID: 31625513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: considering the impact of Sino-US trade on three main industries in China. Wu LK; Feng TT; Luo H; Gong XL; Ge JP Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(36):54796-54812. PubMed ID: 35306653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The carbon footprint of large- and mid-scale hydropower in China: Synthesis from five China's largest hydro-project. Li Z; Du H; Xu H; Xiao Y; Lu L; Guo J; Prairie Y; Mercier-Blais S J Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 250():109363. PubMed ID: 31703242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental-social-economic footprints of consumption and trade in the Asia-Pacific region. Yang L; Wang Y; Wang R; Klemeš JJ; Almeida CMVB; Jin M; Zheng X; Qiao Y Nat Commun; 2020 Sep; 11(1):4490. PubMed ID: 32901036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. China's coal consumption in a globalizing world: Insights from Multi-Regional Input-Output and structural decomposition analysis. Wang Q; Song X; Liu Y Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 711():134790. PubMed ID: 32000324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. China's agricultural GHG emission efficiency: regional disparity and spatial dynamic evolution. Qin Q; Yan H; Liu J; Chen X; Ye B Environ Geochem Health; 2022 Sep; 44(9):2863-2879. PubMed ID: 33123930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Waste paper recycling decision system based on material flow analysis and life cycle assessment: A case study of waste paper recycling from China. Liu M; Tan S; Zhang M; He G; Chen Z; Fu Z; Luan C J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 255():109859. PubMed ID: 32063319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial-temporal evolution and peak prediction of embodied carbon emissions in China's interregional trade. Mo S; Wang T Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1010521. PubMed ID: 36339160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endogenizing Capital in MRIO Models: The Implications for Consumption-Based Accounting. Södersten CH; Wood R; Hertwich EG Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 52(22):13250-13259. PubMed ID: 30198257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Energy carbon emission structure and reduction potential focused on the supply-side and demand-side. Kang J; Yang Y PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239634. PubMed ID: 33021990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An environmentally extended global multi-regional input-output analysis of consumption-based and embodied import-based carbon emissions of Turkey. Mangır N; Şahin ÜA Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(36):54813-54826. PubMed ID: 35307795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How the manufacturing economy impacts China's energy-related GHG emissions: Insights from structural path analysis. Zhang B; Zhang Y; Wu X; Guan C; Qiao H Sci Total Environ; 2020 Nov; 743():140769. PubMed ID: 32663693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from pig production in China on the basis of households' pork consumption. Yan B; Li Y; Yan J; Shi W Environ Int; 2023 Jul; 177():108008. PubMed ID: 37295165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Role of Industrial Parks in Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from China. Guo Y; Tian J; Zang N; Gao Y; Chen L Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Jul; 52(14):7754-7762. PubMed ID: 29902379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]