BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34438276)

  • 1. Occupational and patients effective radiation doses in dental imaging.
    Tamam N; Almuqrin AH; Mansour S; Elnour A; Musa M; Omer H; Sulieman A; Bradley DA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2021 Nov; 177():109899. PubMed ID: 34438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
    Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
    Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
    Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ionizing Radiation Dose Exposure to the Ocular Region of Pain Physicians During C-arm Guided Pain Interventions.
    Kelly R; McMahon A; Hegarty D
    Pain Physician; 2018 Sep; 21(5):E523-E532. PubMed ID: 30282400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occupational doses to the eye lens in pediatric and adult noncardiac interventional radiology procedures.
    Morcillo AB; Alejo L; Huerga C; Bayón J; Marín A; Corredoira E; Novo JR; Hernández T; Ponce MD; Garzón G; Vañó E; Guibelalde E
    Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1956-1966. PubMed ID: 33544901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occupational radiation exposure of health professionals and cancer risk assessment for Lithuanian nuclear medicine workers.
    Adliene D; Griciene B; Skovorodko K; Laurikaitiene J; Puiso J
    Environ Res; 2020 Apr; 183():109144. PubMed ID: 32028181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of patient and occupational exposure and radiation risk from cath-lab procedure.
    Sulieman A; Mahgoub O; Salah H; Tamam N; Taha A; Dawood S; Bradley DA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Dec; 202():111071. PubMed ID: 37871398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Regional Diagnostic Reference Levels in Dental Radiography in Tamil Nadu.
    Jose A; Kumar AS; Govindarajan KN; Sharma SD
    J Med Phys; 2022; 47(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 35548027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 30289498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ESTIMATION OF EFFECTIVE DOSE OF DENTAL X-RAY DEVICES.
    Qiang W; Qiang F; Lin L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):417-421. PubMed ID: 30169836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation exposure to foetus and breasts from dental X-ray examinations: effect of lead shields.
    Kelaranta A; Ekholm M; Toroi P; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150095. PubMed ID: 26313308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values.
    Looe HK; Eenboom F; Chofor N; Pfaffenberger A; Steinhoff M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K; Poppe B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 18550517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the annual occupational effective doses in a SPECT/CT department.
    Aamry A; Sulieman A; Tamam N; Abuhadi NH; Johary Y; Aamri H; Mattar E; Salah H; Osman H; Khandaker MU; Bradley D
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Mar; 181():110097. PubMed ID: 35063867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is dosimetry still a necessity in current dental practice?
    Reddy SS; Rakesh N; Chauhan P; Clint JB; Sharma S
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Dec; 35(4):911-6. PubMed ID: 26619179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose in dental radiology.
    Cohnen M; Kemper J; Möbes O; Pawelzik J; Mödder U
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):634-7. PubMed ID: 11870479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions.
    Buls N; Pagés J; de Mey J; Osteaux M
    Health Phys; 2003 Aug; 85(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 12938963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cone-beam computed tomography imaging: therapeutic staff dose during chemoembolisation procedure.
    Paul J; Chacko A; Mbalisike EC; Vogl TJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Dec; 34(4):843-51. PubMed ID: 25614915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in medical practice in Ghana (2000-09).
    Hasford F; Owusu-Banahene J; Amoako JK; Otoo F; Darko EO; Emi-Reynolds G; Yeboah J; Arwui CC; Adu S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 21743072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multicenter study of radiation doses to the eye lenses of medical staff performing non-vascular imaging and interventional radiology procedures in Japan.
    Matsubara K; Takei Y; Mori H; Kobayashi I; Noto K; Igarashi T; Suzuki S; Akahane K
    Phys Med; 2020 Jun; 74():83-91. PubMed ID: 32446173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
    Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.