These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34438313)
1. Biogas production from high solids digestion of Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum typhoideum: Suitable conditions and microbial communities. Sonwai A; Pholchan P; Pholchan MK; Pardang P; Nuntaphan A; Juangjandee P; Totarat N; Tippayawong N J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 299():113570. PubMed ID: 34438313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Holistic determination of suitable conditions for biogas production from Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum americanum liquor in anaerobic baffled reactor. Suaisom P; Pholchan P; Aggarangsi P J Environ Manage; 2019 Oct; 247():730-737. PubMed ID: 31279804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anaerobic co-digestion of Pennisetum hybrid and pig manure: A comparative study of performance and microbial community at different mixture ratio and organic loading rate. Lianhua L; Shuibin H; Yongming S; Xihui K; Junfeng J; Zhenhong Y; Dingfa L Chemosphere; 2020 May; 247():125871. PubMed ID: 32069711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbial communities involved in biogas production from wheat straw as the sole substrate within a two-phase solid-state anaerobic digestion. Heeg K; Pohl M; Sontag M; Mumme J; Klocke M; Nettmann E Syst Appl Microbiol; 2014 Dec; 37(8):590-600. PubMed ID: 25467556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and wheat straw: Process stability and microbial community structure shifts. Shi X; Guo X; Zuo J; Wang Y; Zhang M Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():261-269. PubMed ID: 29449111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anaerobic digestion of vinasse and water treatment plant sludge increases methane production and stability of UASB reactors. Lima VO; Barros VG; Duda RM; Oliveira RA J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 327():116451. PubMed ID: 36481069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of nitrogen-rich substrates on biogas production and on the methanogenic community under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Munk B; Guebitz GM; Lebuhn M Anaerobe; 2017 Aug; 46():146-154. PubMed ID: 28254264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Different organic loading rates on the biogas production during the anaerobic digestion of rice straw: A pilot study. Zhou J; Yang J; Yu Q; Yong X; Xie X; Zhang L; Wei P; Jia H Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 244(Pt 1):865-871. PubMed ID: 28847074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of organic loading rate on biogas production from macroalgae: Performance and microbial community structure. Sun MT; Fan XL; Zhao XX; Fu SF; He S; Manasa MRK; Guo RB Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jul; 235():292-300. PubMed ID: 28371767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of viscosity on process stability and microbial community composition during anaerobic mesophilic digestion of Maotai-flavored distiller's grains. Ao T; Ran Y; Chen Y; Li R; Luo Y; Liu X; Li D Bioresour Technol; 2020 Feb; 297():122460. PubMed ID: 31784250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved methane production from sugarcane vinasse with filter cake in thermophilic UASB reactors, with predominance of Methanothermobacter and Methanosarcina archaea and Thermotogae bacteria. Barros VG; Duda RM; Vantini JDS; Omori WP; Ferro MIT; Oliveira RA Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 244(Pt 1):371-381. PubMed ID: 28783564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined effects of liquid digestate recirculation and biochar on methane yield, enzyme activity, and microbial community during semi-continuous anaerobic digestion. Shao Z; Chen H; Zhao Z; Yang Z; Qiu L; Guo X Bioresour Technol; 2022 Nov; 364():128042. PubMed ID: 36182021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functionally redundant but dissimilar microbial communities within biogas reactors treating maize silage in co-fermentation with sugar beet silage. Langer SG; Ahmed S; Einfalt D; Bengelsdorf FR; Kazda M Microb Biotechnol; 2015 Sep; 8(5):828-36. PubMed ID: 26200922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anaerobic digestion of food waste - Effect of recirculation and temperature on performance and microbiology. Zamanzadeh M; Hagen LH; Svensson K; Linjordet R; Horn SJ Water Res; 2016 Jun; 96():246-54. PubMed ID: 27060528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance comparison between mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic reactors for treatment of palm oil mill effluent. Jeong JY; Son SM; Pyon JH; Park JY Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():122-8. PubMed ID: 24797939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of on-demand biogas production by using sugar beet silage. Ahmed S; Kazda M Anaerobe; 2017 Aug; 46():114-121. PubMed ID: 28465255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of temperature and organic loading rate on siphon-driven self-agitated anaerobic digestion performance for food waste treatment. Hu Y; Kobayashi T; Qi W; Oshibe H; Xu KQ Waste Manag; 2018 Apr; 74():150-157. PubMed ID: 29269284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study of two-stage anaerobic digestion of solid potato waste using reactors under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Parawira W; Murto M; Read JS; Mattiasson B Environ Technol; 2007 Nov; 28(11):1205-16. PubMed ID: 18290530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge with high-solids content: Reactor performance and microbial community. Wu ZL; Lin Z; Sun ZY; Gou M; Xia ZY; Tang YQ Bioresour Technol; 2020 Apr; 302():122851. PubMed ID: 32007850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]