These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34441143)

  • 21. Finite-Key Analysis for Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete-Phase Randomization.
    Wang RQ; Yin ZQ; Jin XH; Wang R; Wang S; Chen W; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 36832625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reference-frame-independent, measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using fewer quantum states.
    Lee D; Hong S; Cho YW; Lim HT; Han SW; Jung H; Moon S; Lee KJ; Kim YS
    Opt Lett; 2020 May; 45(9):2624-2627. PubMed ID: 32356832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Free-space optical wiretap channel and experimental secret key agreement in 7.8 km terrestrial link.
    Fujiwara M; Ito T; Kitamura M; Endo H; Tsuzuki O; Toyoshima M; Takenaka H; Takayama Y; Shimizu R; Takeoka M; Matsumoto R; Sasaki M
    Opt Express; 2018 Jul; 26(15):19513-19523. PubMed ID: 30114122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Provably Secure Symmetric Private Information Retrieval with Quantum Cryptography.
    Kon WY; Lim CCW
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 33396236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Review of Security Evaluation of Practical Quantum Key Distribution System.
    Sun S; Huang A
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Feb; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 35205554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hacking on decoy-state quantum key distribution system with partial phase randomization.
    Sun SH; Jiang MS; Ma XC; Li CY; Liang LM
    Sci Rep; 2014 Apr; 4():4759. PubMed ID: 24755767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Continuous-variable quantum key distribution robust against environmental disturbances.
    Zhao H; Wang T; Xu Y; Li L; Tan Z; Tan P; Huang P; Zeng G
    Opt Express; 2024 Feb; 32(5):7783-7799. PubMed ID: 38439451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution for two independent parties.
    Xin J; Lu XM; Li X; Li G
    Opt Express; 2020 Apr; 28(8):11439-11450. PubMed ID: 32403655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantum Key Distribution with Displaced Thermal States.
    Walton A; Ghesquière A; Varcoe BTH
    Entropy (Basel); 2024 May; 26(6):. PubMed ID: 38920497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Counterfactual quantum key distribution with untrusted detectors.
    Lin YQ; Wang M; Yang XQ; Liu HW
    Heliyon; 2023 Feb; 9(2):e13719. PubMed ID: 36879753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interference between independent photonic integrated devices for quantum key distribution.
    Semenenko H; Sibson P; Thompson MG; Erven C
    Opt Lett; 2019 Jan; 44(2):275-278. PubMed ID: 30644879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantum photonic network and physical layer security.
    Sasaki M; Endo H; Fujiwara M; Kitamura M; Ito T; Shimizu R; Toyoshima M
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2017 Aug; 375(2099):. PubMed ID: 28652495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Key on demand (KoD) for software-defined optical networks secured by quantum key distribution (QKD).
    Cao Y; Zhao Y; Colman-Meixner C; Yu X; Zhang J
    Opt Express; 2017 Oct; 25(22):26453-26467. PubMed ID: 29092135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of experimental impairments on the security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution.
    Ruiz-Chamorro A; Cano D; Garcia-Callejo A; Fernandez V
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16670. PubMed ID: 37303546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Eurasian-scale experimental satellite-based quantum key distribution with detector efficiency mismatch analysis.
    Khmelev A; Duplinsky A; Bakhshaliev R; Ivchenko E; Pismeniuk L; Mayboroda V; Nesterov I; Chernov A; Trushechkin A; Kiktenko E; Kurochkin V; Fedorov A
    Opt Express; 2024 Mar; 32(7):11964-11978. PubMed ID: 38571032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. All-fiber self-compensating polarization encoder for quantum key distribution.
    Agnesi C; Avesani M; Stanco A; Villoresi P; Vallone G
    Opt Lett; 2019 May; 44(10):2398-2401. PubMed ID: 31090697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two-party secret key distribution via a modified quantum secret sharing protocol.
    Grice WP; Evans PG; Lawrie B; Legré M; Lougovski P; Ray W; Williams BP; Qi B; Smith AM
    Opt Express; 2015 Mar; 23(6):7300-11. PubMed ID: 25837073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Covert Quantum Communication.
    Arrazola JM; Scarani V
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Dec; 117(25):250503. PubMed ID: 28036222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantum key distribution session with 16-dimensional photonic states.
    Etcheverry S; Cañas G; Gómez ES; Nogueira WA; Saavedra C; Xavier GB; Lima G
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():2316. PubMed ID: 23897033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantum key distribution with prepare-and-measure Bell test.
    Tan YG
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35032. PubMed ID: 27733771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.