These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34441859)

  • 1. A Multi-Criteria Assessment Strategy for 3D Printed Porous Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Patient-Specific Implants for Orbital Wall Reconstruction.
    Sharma N; Welker D; Aghlmandi S; Maintz M; Zeilhofer HF; Honigmann P; Seifert T; Thieringer FM
    J Clin Med; 2021 Aug; 10(16):. PubMed ID: 34441859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative Assessment of Point-of-Care 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cranial Implants.
    Sharma N; Aghlmandi S; Dalcanale F; Seiler D; Zeilhofer HF; Honigmann P; Thieringer FM
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 34445228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generation of customized orbital implant templates using 3-dimensional printing for orbital wall reconstruction.
    Kang S; Kwon J; Ahn CJ; Esmaeli B; Kim GB; Kim N; Sa HS
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Dec; 32(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 30154573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality Characteristics and Clinical Relevance of In-House 3D-Printed Customized Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implants for Craniofacial Reconstruction.
    Sharma N; Aghlmandi S; Cao S; Kunz C; Honigmann P; Thieringer FM
    J Clin Med; 2020 Aug; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32878160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Its 3D-Printed Quantitate Assessment in Cranial Reconstruction.
    Moiduddin K; Mian SH; Elseufy SM; Alkhalefah H; Ramalingam S; Sayeed A
    J Funct Biomater; 2023 Aug; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 37623673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can Steam Sterilization Affect the Accuracy of Point-of-Care 3D Printed Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Customized Cranial Implants? An Investigative Analysis.
    Sharma N; Zubizarreta-Oteiza J; Tourbier C; Thieringer FM
    J Clin Med; 2023 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 37048579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classical Orbital Floor Post-Traumatic Reconstruction vs. Customized Reconstruction with the Support of "In-House" 3D-Printed Models: A Retrospective Study with an Analysis of Volumetric Measurement.
    Kallaverja E; Barca I; Ferragina F; Cristofaro MG
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jun; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 38928663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-specific 3D printed Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) dental implant system.
    Sonaye SY; Bokam VK; Saini A; Nayak VV; Witek L; Coelho PG; Bhaduri SB; Bottino MC; Sikder P
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Dec; 136():105510. PubMed ID: 36244326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-Specific Surgical Implants Made of 3D Printed PEEK: Material, Technology, and Scope of Surgical Application.
    Honigmann P; Sharma N; Okolo B; Popp U; Msallem B; Thieringer FM
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4520636. PubMed ID: 29713642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-specific puzzle implant preformed with 3D-printed rapid prototype model for combined orbital floor and medial wall fracture.
    Kim YC; Min KH; Choi JW; Koh KS; Oh TS; Jeong WS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Apr; 71(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 29233510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical concept of patient-specific, ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene orbital wall implant.
    Kozakiewicz M; Elgalal M; Walkowiak B; Stefanczyk L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 23333489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical behavior of 3D-printed PEEK and its application for personalized orbital implants with various infill patterns and densities.
    Timoumi M; Barhoumi N; Znaidi A; Maazouz A; Lamnawar K
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Dec; 136():105534. PubMed ID: 36327664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restoration of the inferomedial orbital strut using a standardized three-dimensional printing implant.
    Kim JH; Lee IG; Lee JS; Oh DY; Jun YJ; Rhie JW; Shim JH; Moon SH
    J Anat; 2020 May; 236(5):923-930. PubMed ID: 31852015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An In Vitro Study of Osteoblast Response on Fused-Filament Fabrication 3D Printed PEEK for Dental and Cranio-Maxillofacial Implants.
    Han X; Sharma N; Xu Z; Scheideler L; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Rupp F; Thieringer FM; Spintzyk S
    J Clin Med; 2019 May; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 31159171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-Cost 3D Printing Orbital Implant Templates in Secondary Orbital Reconstructions.
    Callahan AB; Campbell AA; Petris C; Kazim M
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017; 33(5):376-380. PubMed ID: 28230707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design of customized implants and 3D printing of symmetric and asymmetric cranial cavities.
    Singh HN; Agrawal S; Kuthe AM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106061. PubMed ID: 37544200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-Hospital 3D Printed Scaphoid Prosthesis Using Medical-Grade Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Biomaterial.
    Honigmann P; Sharma N; Schumacher R; Rueegg J; Haefeli M; Thieringer F
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():1301028. PubMed ID: 33506009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of Customized Alveolar Bone Augmentation Using Titanium Scaffolds vs Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Scaffolds: A Comparative Study Based on 3D Printing Technology.
    Li L; Gao H; Wang C; Ji P; Huang Y; Wang C
    ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2022 May; 8(5):2028-2039. PubMed ID: 35443132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implantation of Customized, Preshaped Implant for Orbital Fractures with the Aid of Three-dimensional Printing.
    Nekooei S; Sardabi M; Razavi ME; Nekooei A; Kiarudi MY
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2018; 25(1):56-58. PubMed ID: 29899654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
    Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.