These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34442379)

  • 1. Of Screening, Stratification, and Scores.
    Knoppers BM; Bernier A; Granados Moreno P; Pashayan N
    J Pers Med; 2021 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34442379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical layering in AI-driven polygenic risk scores-New complexities, new challenges.
    Fritzsche MC; Akyüz K; Cano Abadía M; McLennan S; Marttinen P; Mayrhofer MT; Buyx AM
    Front Genet; 2023; 14():1098439. PubMed ID: 36816027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public health genomics and personalized prevention: lessons from the COGS project.
    Pashayan N; Hall A; Chowdhury S; Dent T; Pharoah PD; Burton H
    J Intern Med; 2013 Nov; 274(5):451-6. PubMed ID: 24127941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Population-based screening in the era of genomics.
    Pashayan N; Pharoah P
    Per Med; 2012 Jun; 9(4):451-455. PubMed ID: 22984365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptability of risk stratification within population-based cancer screening from the perspective of healthcare professionals: A mixed methods systematic review and recommendations to support implementation.
    Taylor LC; Law K; Hutchinson A; Dennison RA; Usher-Smith JA
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0279201. PubMed ID: 36827432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical and legal implications of implementing risk algorithms for early detection and screening for oesophageal cancer, now and in the future.
    Brigden T; Mitchell C; Redrup Hill E; Hall A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0293576. PubMed ID: 37903120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public Preferences for Determining Eligibility for Screening in Risk-Stratified Cancer Screening Programs: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Dennison RA; Taylor LC; Morris S; Boscott RA; Harrison H; Moorthie SA; Rossi SH; Stewart GD; Usher-Smith JA
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Apr; 43(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 36786399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential use of clinical polygenic risk scores in psychiatry - ethical implications and communicating high polygenic risk.
    Palk AC; Dalvie S; de Vries J; Martin AR; Stein DJ
    Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2019 Feb; 14(1):4. PubMed ID: 30813945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation and implications for polygenic risk scores in healthcare.
    Slunecka JL; van der Zee MD; Beck JJ; Johnson BN; Finnicum CT; Pool R; Hottenga JJ; de Geus EJC; Ehli EA
    Hum Genomics; 2021 Jul; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 34284826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Genomic newborn screening. Perspective from the Ethics Commission of the Spanish Society for Human Genetics. Part II: Ethical, legal and social issues (ELSIs) of the introduction of next generation sequencing technologies in a public health newborn screening program.].
    Pàmpols Ros T; Pérez Aytés A; García Sagredo JM; Díaz de Bustamante A; Blanco Guillermo I
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2022 Mar; 96():. PubMed ID: 35283479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How can polygenic inheritance be used in population screening for common diseases?
    Khoury MJ; Janssens AC; Ransohoff DF
    Genet Med; 2013 Jun; 15(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 23412608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personalized medicine for prevention: can risk stratified screening decrease colorectal cancer mortality at an acceptable cost?
    Subramanian S; Bobashev G; Morris RJ; Hoover S
    Cancer Causes Control; 2017 Apr; 28(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 28224411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal and ethical concerns in personalized medicine: a European perspective.
    Regniault A; Kupecz A; Gavey M; Mignolet O; De Carlo P; Meyer P; Bailey S
    Per Med; 2009 Sep; 6(5):517-528. PubMed ID: 29783304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "It's personalized, but it's still bucket based": The promise of personalized medicine vs. the reality of genomic risk stratification in a breast cancer screening trial.
    James JE; Joseph G
    New Genet Soc; 2022; 41(3):228-253. PubMed ID: 36936188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.
    Ho PJ; Tan IB; Chong DQ; Khor CC; Yuan JM; Koh WP; Dorajoo R; Li J
    Elife; 2023 Mar; 12():. PubMed ID: 36971353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advocating for equitable management of hereditary cancer syndromes.
    Caffrey RG
    J Genet Couns; 2022 Jun; 31(3):584-589. PubMed ID: 35032082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk stratification, genomic data and the law.
    Hall A; Finnegan T; Chowdhury S; Dent T; Kroese M; Burton H
    J Community Genet; 2018 Jul; 9(3):195-199. PubMed ID: 29470710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Polygenic Risk Score to Refine Risk Stratification and Prediction for Severe Liver Disease by Clinical Fibrosis Scores.
    De Vincentis A; Tavaglione F; Jamialahmadi O; Picardi A; Antonelli Incalzi R; Valenti L; Romeo S; Vespasiani-Gentilucci U
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Mar; 20(3):658-673. PubMed ID: 34091049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.