These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34443016)

  • 1. Numerical Analysis of Steel Geodesic Dome under Seismic Excitations.
    Pilarska D; Maleska T
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Aug; 14(16):. PubMed ID: 34443016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constructions of innovative geodesic domes in terms of the sustainable and efficient cross-sections using.
    Bysiec D
    Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):20444. PubMed ID: 39227629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seismic Assessment of Footbridges under Spatial Variation of Earthquake Ground Motion (SVEGM): Experimental Testing and Finite Element Analyses.
    Drygala IJ; Dulinska JM; Polak MA
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32102301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behaviour of Soil-Steel Composite Bridges under Strong Seismic Excitation with Various Boundary Conditions.
    Maleska T; Beben D
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Jan; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 36676386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correction: Bysiec et al. Numerical Analysis of Steel Geodesic Dome under Seismic Excitations.
    Bysiec D; Maleska T
    Materials (Basel); 2024 Jan; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 38204125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical and spatial determinants of cytoskeletal geodesic dome formation in cardiac fibroblasts.
    Entcheva E; Bien H
    Integr Biol (Camb); 2009 Feb; 1(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 20023805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-period earthquakes and co-eruptive dome inflation seen with particle image velocimetry.
    Johnson JB; Lees JM; Gerst A; Sahagian D; Varley N
    Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7220):377-81. PubMed ID: 19020619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical Investigation of the Seismic Performance of Steel Frames with Energy-Dissipating Composite Walls.
    Wei D; Suizi J
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jan; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 35160774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical Simulations to Predict the Seismic Performance of a 2-Story Steel Moment-Resisting Frame.
    Tartaglia R; D'Aniello M; Landolfo R
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Oct; 13(21):. PubMed ID: 33126752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Seismic mitigation of steel modular building structures through innovative inter-modular connections.
    Sendanayake SV; Thambiratnam DP; Perera N; Chan T; Aghdamy S
    Heliyon; 2019 Nov; 5(11):e02751. PubMed ID: 31844698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical Study on the Seismic Performance of Cold-Formed Steel Shear Walls with Steel Sheathing and Gypsum Board.
    Liu S; Feng R; Zhong Y
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 37629976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Numerical simulation on seismic pounding damage in a simply-supported steel bridge.
    Shi F; Wang D; Tong L; Tang W
    Heliyon; 2023 Nov; 9(11):e22297. PubMed ID: 38053907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seismic Response Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Frame Structures with URSP Connectors.
    Duan L; Nie X; Su H; Tan J
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Dec; 15(23):. PubMed ID: 36500149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specific seismic retrofitting of a compact reinforced concrete building with X-bracings and steel jackets. Application to a primary school in Huelva.
    Romero-Sánchez E; Morales-Esteban A; Requena-García-Cruz MV; Zapico-Blanco B; de-Miguel-Rodríguez J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238505. PubMed ID: 32915839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seismic design of setback irregular steel structures based on life cycle cost.
    Jebelli ST; Behnam B; Tehrani P
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):16784. PubMed ID: 36202984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study on seismic vulnerability analysis of the interaction system between saturated soft soil and subway station structures.
    Cheng X; Li Q; Hai R; He X
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):7410. PubMed ID: 37150802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental Characterization, Modeling, and Numerical Evaluation of a Novel Friction Damper for the Seismic Upgrade of Existing Buildings.
    Bruschi E; Zoccolini L; Cattaneo S; Quaglini V
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Feb; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 36903048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Structural Analysis of GFRP, Reinforced Concrete, and Steel Frames under Seismic Loads.
    Mincigrucci L; Civera M; Lenticchia E; Ceravolo R; Rosano M; Russo S
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Jul; 16(14):. PubMed ID: 37512183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seismic isolation retrofitting solution for an existing steel cable-stayed bridge.
    Javanmardi A; Ibrahim Z; Ghaedi K; Khan NB; Benisi Ghadim H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200482. PubMed ID: 30059506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.