159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34443165)
1. Active Tactile Sensibility of Brånemark Protocol Prostheses: A Case-Control Clinical Study.
Moraes N; Moraes E; Anastacio T; Silva L; Machado A; Schoichet J; Alto RM; Mello-Machado R; Cardarelli A; Mourão CFAB; Casado P; Romanos G
Materials (Basel); 2021 Aug; 14(16):. PubMed ID: 34443165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of active tactile sensibility in a single-tooth implant opposing a natural tooth with either an immediate or delayed functional loading protocol: A parallel design clinical study.
Deepika K; Bhatnagar A; Singh A; Soni R
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36621356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo measurements of some functional aspects with mandibular fixed prostheses supported by implants.
Mericske-Stern R; Zarb GA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Jun; 7(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 9002834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants.
Mericske-Stern R; Assal P; Mericske E; Bürgin W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 7615331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of Active Oral Tactile Sensitivity in Individuals with Complete Natural Dentition.
Anastacio TH; de Moraes NB; de Moraes EJ; Quinelato V; Calasans-Maia JA; Martins CC; Aguiar T; Machado AN; Casado PL
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Mar; 22(3):268-272. PubMed ID: 34210927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tactile Sensibility Thresholds in Implant Prosthesis, Complete Dentures and Natural Dentition: Review about Their Value in Literature.
González-Gil D; Flores-Fraile J; López-Marcos J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(4):. PubMed ID: 35454340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Active Tactile Sensibility in Implant Prosthesis vs. Complete Dentures: A Psychophysical Study.
González-Gil D; Dib-Zaitun I; Flores-Fraile J; López-Marcos J
J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36431296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Active tactile sensibility of three-unit implant-supported FPDs versus natural dentition.
Negahdari R; Ghavimi M; Ghanizadeh M; Bohlouli S
J Clin Exp Dent; 2019 Jul; 11(7):e636-e641. PubMed ID: 31516662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of Osseoperception and Tactile Sensibility during Masticatory Function in Different Prosthetic Rehabilitations: A Review.
González-Gil D; Dib-Zaitum I; Flores-Fraile J; López-Marcos J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Jan; 58(1):. PubMed ID: 35056400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full-Arch, Screw-Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study.
Drago C
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):402-408. PubMed ID: 27416302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Active tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants versus natural dentition: a split-mouth double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Kazemi M; Geramipanah F; Negahdari R; Rakhshan V
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 23490397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequency and Type of Prosthetic Complications Associated with Interim, Immediately Loaded Full-Arch Prostheses: A 2-Year Retrospective Chart Review.
Drago C
J Prosthodont; 2016 Aug; 25(6):433-9. PubMed ID: 26372550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Interim, Acrylic Resin, Full-Arch Screw-Retained Prostheses and Their Relationship to Prosthetic Complications.
Drago C
J Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 26(6):502-507. PubMed ID: 26848820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Passive tactile sensibility in edentulous subjects treated with dental implants: a pilot study.
El-Sheikh AM; Hobkirk JA; Howell PG; Gilthorpe MS
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jan; 91(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 14739890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants and natural teeth under local anesthesia of the natural antagonistic teeth.
Enkling N; Heussner S; Nicolay C; Bayer S; Mericske-Stern R; Utz KH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 20030674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark TiUnite implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 1-year results of a prospective clinical study.
Glauser R; Lundgren AK; Gottlow J; Sennerby L; Portmann M; Ruhstaller P; Hämmerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2003; 5 Suppl 1():47-56. PubMed ID: 12691650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prosthetic design related to peri-implant bone resorption in microvascular free fibular flap among patients with oral cancer: A retrospective clinical study.
Huang YF; Liu SP; Muo CH; Chang CT
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):395-399. PubMed ID: 31864639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanosensation and maximum bite force in edentulous patients rehabilitated with bimaxillary implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Luraschi J; Schimmel M; Bernard JP; Gallucci GO; Belser U; Müller F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 May; 23(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 22092337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses.
Batista M; Bonachela W; Soares J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 18422982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]