202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34444101)
1. A Biomechanical Comparison of the Safety-Bar, High-Bar and Low-Bar Squat around the Sticking Region among Recreationally Resistance-Trained Men and Women.
Kristiansen E; Larsen S; Haugen ME; Helms E; van den Tillaar R
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Stance Width and Barbell Placement on Kinematics, Kinetics, and Myoelectric Activity in Back Squats.
Larsen S; Kristiansen E; Helms E; van den Tillaar R
Front Sports Act Living; 2021; 3():719013. PubMed ID: 34541522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Biomechanical Comparison Between the Safety-Squat Bar and Traditional Barbell Back Squat.
Johansson DG; Marchetti PH; Stecyk SD; Flanagan SP
J Strength Cond Res; 2024 May; 38(5):825-834. PubMed ID: 38595263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New Insights About the Sticking Region in Back Squats: An Analysis of Kinematics, Kinetics, and Myoelectric Activity.
Larsen S; Kristiansen E; van den Tillaar R
Front Sports Act Living; 2021; 3():691459. PubMed ID: 34169277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Biomechanical Comparison Between a High and Low Barbell Placement on Net Joint Moments, Kinematics, Muscle Forces, and Muscle-Specific Moments in 3 Repetition Maximum Back Squats.
Larsen S; de Zee M; Kristiansen EL; van den Tillaar R
J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jul; 38(7):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 38900172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of barbell load on kinematics, kinetics, and myoelectric activity in back squats.
Larsen S; Kristiansen E; Nygaard Falch H; Estifanos Haugen M; Fimland MS; van den Tillaar R
Sports Biomech; 2022 Jun; ():1-15. PubMed ID: 35686617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effects of Barbell Placement on Kinematics and Muscle Activation Around the Sticking Region in Squats.
van den Tillaar R; Knutli TR; Larsen S
Front Sports Act Living; 2020; 2():604177. PubMed ID: 33345183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the Occurrence of the Sticking Region in Maximum Smith Machine Squats the Result of Diminishing Potentiation and Co-Contraction of the Prime Movers among Recreationally Resistance Trained Males?
van den Tillaar R; Kristiansen EL; Larsen S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33540938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical comparison of back and front squats in healthy trained individuals.
Gullett JC; Tillman MD; Gutierrez GM; Chow JW
J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):284-92. PubMed ID: 19002072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Knee Kinetics During Squats of Varying Loads and Depths in Recreationally Trained Women.
Flores V; Becker J; Burkhardt E; Cotter J
J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jul; 34(7):1945-1952. PubMed ID: 29528960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of squat depth and barbell load on relative muscular effort in squatting.
Bryanton MA; Kennedy MD; Carey JP; Chiu LZ
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Oct; 26(10):2820-8. PubMed ID: 22797000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quadriceps effort during squat exercise depends on hip extensor muscle strategy.
Bryanton MA; Carey JP; Kennedy MD; Chiu LZ
Sports Biomech; 2015 Mar; 14(1):122-38. PubMed ID: 25895990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of kinematics and electromyography in the last repetition during different maximum repetition sets in the barbell back squat.
Falch HN; Hegdahl Gundersen A; Larsen S; Estifanos Haugen M; van den Tillaar R
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16865. PubMed ID: 38313010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Support moment distribution during the back squat at different depths and loads in recreationally trained females.
Goodman W; Flores V; Cotter JA; Graham D; Becker J
J Sci Med Sport; 2024 Feb; 27(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 38036316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are Diminishing Potentiation and Large Extensor Moments the Cause for the Occurrence of the Sticking Region in Maximum Free-Weight Barbell Back Squats among Resistance-Trained Males?
van den Tillaar R; Falch HN; Larsen S
J Hum Kinet; 2024 Mar; 91(Spec Issue):105-119. PubMed ID: 38689586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heel-Raised Foot Posture Does Not Affect Trunk and Lower Extremity Biomechanics During a Barbell Back Squat in Recreational Weight lifters.
Lee SP; Gillis CB; Ibarra JJ; Oldroyd DF; Zane RS
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):606-614. PubMed ID: 30789547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The High-Bar and Low-Bar Back-Squats: A Biomechanical Analysis.
Glassbrook DJ; Brown SR; Helms ER; Duncan S; Storey AG
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():S1-S18. PubMed ID: 28195975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximal Strength, Muscle Activation, and Bar Velocity Comparisons Between Squatting With a Traditional or Safety Squat Bar.
Vantrease WC; Townsend JR; Sapp PA; Henry RN; Johnson KD
J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Feb; 35(Suppl 1):S1-S5. PubMed ID: 32032231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparisons of back and front squats with a straight bar and four squats with a transformer bar.
Goršič M; Rochelle LE; Layer JS; Smith DT; Novak D; Dai B
Sports Biomech; 2024 Feb; 23(2):166-181. PubMed ID: 33161870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyographic Activity in the Back Squat and Barbell Hip Thrust Exercises.
Contreras B; Vigotsky AD; Schoenfeld BJ; Beardsley C; Cronin J
J Appl Biomech; 2015 Dec; 31(6):452-8. PubMed ID: 26214739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
