These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34447061)

  • 1. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study.
    Venugopal K; Krishnaprasad L; V P PS; Ravi AB; Haridas K; Soman D
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S132-S136. PubMed ID: 34447061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An
    Meshram P; Meshram V; Palve D; Patil S; Gade V; Raut A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):403-407. PubMed ID: 31397416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
    Bansal D; Mahajan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing marginal microleakage in Class V cavities restored with flowable composite and Cention-N using confocal microscope-an
    Shenoi PR; Kokane VB; Thawale HV; Kubde RR; Gunwal MK; Shahu SP
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(3):348-353. PubMed ID: 35229775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage Between Nano-Ionomer, Giomer and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Cavities- CLSM Study.
    Bollu IP; Hari A; Thumu J; Velagula LD; Bolla N; Varri S; Kasaraneni S; Nalli SV
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 May; 10(5):ZC66-70. PubMed ID: 27437363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage Comparative Evaluation of RMGIC and Alkasite with and without Adhesive System in Class V Cavity: An
    Dennis D; Pintauli S; Debora S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jul; 22(7):735-738. PubMed ID: 34615776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study.
    Sengar EV; Mulay S; Beri L; Gupta A; Almohareb T; Binalrimal S; Robaian A; Bahammam MA; Bahammam HA; Bahammam SA; Zidane B; Albar NH; Bhandi S; Shrivastava D; Srivastava KC; Patil S
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jul; 15(14):. PubMed ID: 35888429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An
    Punathil S; Almalki SA; AlJameel AH; Gowdar IM; Mc VA; Chinnari K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):778-782. PubMed ID: 31597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers.
    Majety KK; Pujar M
    J Conserv Dent; 2011 Oct; 14(4):414-7. PubMed ID: 22144815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.
    Sujith R; Yadav TG; Pitalia D; Babaji P; Apoorva K; Sharma A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun; 21(6):691-695. PubMed ID: 33025941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro microleakage study of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials.
    Sadeghi M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Jul; 9(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 23162589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of three lining materials on microleakage of packable composite resin restorations in young premolars with cavity margins located on enamel and dentin/cementum - An
    Rizk HM; Al-Ruthea M; Habibullah MA
    Int J Health Sci (Qassim); 2018; 12(6):8-17. PubMed ID: 30534038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer: An in vitro study.
    Eronat N; Yilmaz E; Kara N; Ak AT
    Eur J Dent; 2014 Oct; 8(4):450-455. PubMed ID: 25512723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of microleakage in posterior nanocomposite restorations with adhesive liners.
    Simi B; Suprabha B
    J Conserv Dent; 2011 Apr; 14(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 21814362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
    Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
    Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.