BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34447064)

  • 1. A Survey of Retention Practices and Protocols Followed Among Orthodontists in India.
    Sr R; Singaraju GS; Mandava P; Ganugapanta VR; Bapireddy H; Pilli LN
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S149-S156. PubMed ID: 34447064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia.
    Ab Rahman N; Low TF; Idris NS
    Korean J Orthod; 2016 Jan; 46(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26877981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A survey of protocols and trends in orthodontic retention.
    Andriekute A; Vasiliauskas A; Sidlauskas A
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Oct; 18(1):31. PubMed ID: 28990138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists.
    Meade MJ; Millett D
    J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 40(4):318-25. PubMed ID: 24297964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey.
    Carneiro NCR; Nóbrega MTC; Meade MJ; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jul; 162(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 35153115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists.
    Vandevska-Radunovic V; Espeland L; Stenvik A
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e110-7. PubMed ID: 23646321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey on retention procedures and use of thermoplastic retainers among orthodontists in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark.
    Hamran T; Čirgić E; Aiyar A; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    J World Fed Orthod; 2022 Aug; 11(4):114-119. PubMed ID: 35718706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention practices and factors affecting retainer choice among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia.
    Al-Jewair TS; Hamidaddin MA; Alotaibi HM; Alqahtani ND; Albarakati SF; Alkofide EA; Al-Moammar KA
    Saudi Med J; 2016 Aug; 37(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 27464868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States.
    Valiathan M; Hughes E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):170-7; discussion 177. PubMed ID: 20152670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures.
    Padmos JAD; Fudalej PS; Renkema AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 29602341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost analysis of two types of fixed maxillary retainers and a removable vacuum-formed maxillary retainer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sonesson M; Naraghi S; Bondemark L
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 35021204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthodontic retention to have and to hold.
    Kalha AS
    Evid Based Dent; 2016 Dec; 17(4):105-106. PubMed ID: 27980334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective evaluation of compliance after orthodontic treatment using Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers: A 2-center randomized controlled trial over a 3-month period.
    Vagdouti G; Karvouni E; Bitsanis E; Koletsi D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):717-726.e2. PubMed ID: 31784005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blanket or tailored prescription of retainers in orthodontics: a questionnaire-based study.
    Al-Moghrabi D; Alkadhimi A; Abu Arqub S; Fleming PS
    Angle Orthod; 2023 Dec; 94(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 38319063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention Protocols and Factors Affecting Retainer Choice among Iraqi Orthodontists.
    Abid MF; Al-Attar AM; Alhuwaizi AF
    Int J Dent; 2020; 2020():8810641. PubMed ID: 33149739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ORTHODONTIST CLINICAL EXPERIENCE AND CLINICAL SITUATION SIGNIFICANTLY INFLUENCE THE RETENTION PROTOCOL - A SURVEY FROM CROATIA.
    Popović Z; Trinajstić Zrinski M; Špalj S
    Acta Clin Croat; 2020 Mar; 59(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 32724269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Level of satisfaction in the use of the wraparound Hawley and thermoplastic maxillary retainers.
    Chagas AS; Freitas KMS; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; Canuto LFG; Oliveira RCG; Oliveira RCG
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 31335161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the effectiveness of two different orthodontic retention protocols.
    Kalaydzhieva M; Krasteva S; Stoilova-Todorova M; Todorova-Plachyiska K; Georgiev K
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2023 Aug; 65(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 37655385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.
    Saleh M; Hajeer MY; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Factors affecting stability after fixed orthodontic treatment].
    Ren SS; Dai X; Ying M; Wang WX; Chang J; Hou ZM
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 53(9):599-603. PubMed ID: 30196619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.