These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34447068)

  • 1. Reliability of Photogrammetric Landmarks to the Conventional Cephalogram for Analyzing Soft-Tissue Landmarks in Orthodontics.
    Jaiswal P; Gandhi A; Gupta AR; Malik N; Singh SK; Ramesh K
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S171-S175. PubMed ID: 34447068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photogrammetric reliability of frontal facial photographs with radiographs and anthropometric measurements.
    Negi G; Chitra P
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2019; 9(3):280-285. PubMed ID: 31289717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photogrammetric Correlation of Face with Frontal Radiographs and Direct Measurements.
    Negi G; Ponnada S; Aravind NKS; Chitra P
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 May; 11(5):ZC79-ZC83. PubMed ID: 28658914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part I: Methodology and reliability.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 7771369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Greiner M; Greiner A; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jul; 68(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 17639277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic soft-tissue analysis on orthodontic frontal and lateral facial photographs based on deep learning.
    Chang Q; Bai Y; Wang S; Wang F; Wang Y; Zuo F; Xie X
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38967085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photography versus lateral cephalogram: role in facial diagnosis.
    Patel DP; Trivedi R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 24355960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits of lateral cephalogram during landmark identification on posteroanterior cephalograms.
    Hwang SA; Lee JS; Hwang HS; Lee KM
    Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 30603623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
    Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Landmark Reliability between Manual and Computerized Plotting Methods.
    Kasinathan G; Kommi PB; Kumar SM; Yashwant A; Arani N; Sabapathy S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(4):317-321. PubMed ID: 28349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Na ER; Aljawad H; Lee KM; Hwang HS
    Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30603624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.
    Mehta P; Sagarkar RM; Mathew S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZC60-ZC64. PubMed ID: 28764295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative assessment of cephalometric with its analogous photographic variables.
    Gupta S; Tandon P; Singh GP; Shastri D
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2022; 13(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 35911811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of the integrated radiograph-photograph method to obtain natural head position in cephalometric diagnosis.
    Dvortsin DP; Ye Q; Pruim GJ; Dijkstra PU; Ren Y
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):889-94. PubMed ID: 21542723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.