These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34447068)
21. The Effect of Emboss Enhancement on Reliability of Landmark Identification in Digital Lateral Cephalometric Images. Nikneshan S; Mohseni S; Nouri M; Hadian H; Kharazifard MJ Iran J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 12(2):e19302. PubMed ID: 26060555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Facial Measurements of Digital Photographs and Wrapped Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Photographs. Alhammadi MS; Al-Mashraqi AA; Alnami RH; Ashqar NM; Alamir OH; Halboub E; Reda R; Testarelli L; Patil S Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 33922543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prevalence of facial asymmetry in Tirupati population: A posteroanterior cephalometric and photographic study. Reddy MR; Bogavilli SR; Raghavendra V; Polina VS; Basha SZ; Preetham R J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Dec; 6(Suppl 3):S205-S212. PubMed ID: 28217538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Photocephalometry: errors of projection and landmark location. Phillips C; Greer J; Vig P; Matteson S Am J Orthod; 1984 Sep; 86(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 6591803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms. Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Facial photogrammetric profile measurements and sagittal dental occlusion in the young Congolese Bantu Adult (DRC). Esabish PL; Beugre-Kouassi LMA; Baukaka FS; Nzanza RM; Gboro TD; Beugre JB Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):342-353. PubMed ID: 31053446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Photographic assessment of cephalometric measurements. de Carvalho Rosas Gomes L; Horta KO; Gandini LG; Gonçalves M; Gonçalves JR Angle Orthod; 2013 Nov; 83(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 23597034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults. Pandian KS; Krishnan S; Kumar SA Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 29652003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Facial morphology in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and moderate to severe temporomandibular joint involvement. Hsieh YJ; Darvann TA; Hermann NV; Larsen P; Liao YF; Bjoern-Joergensen J; Kreiborg S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 26827974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Implementing a superimposition and measurement model for 3D sagittal analysis of therapy-induced changes in facial soft tissue: a pilot study. Hoefert CS; Bacher M; Herberts T; Krimmel M; Reinert S; Hoefert S; Göz G J Orofac Orthop; 2010 May; 71(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 20503004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of gonial angle determination from cephalograms and orthopantomogram. Bhullar MK; Uppal AS; Kochhar GK; Chachra S; Kochhar AS Indian J Dent; 2014 Jul; 5(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 25565740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Establishment of soft tissue norms for the north Indian population based on laymen perception. Gupta A; Garg J; Anand N; Hegde M; Parashar S J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Mar; 13(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 24644392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A new craniofacial diagnostic technique: the Sydney diagnostic system. Moate SJ; Geenty JP; Shen G; Darendeliler MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 17346588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms. Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pitfalls at the root of facial assessment on photographs: a quantitative study of accuracy in positioning facial landmarks. Cummaudo M; Guerzoni M; Marasciuolo L; Gibelli D; Cigada A; Obertovà Z; Ratnayake M; Poppa P; Gabriel P; Ritz-Timme S; Cattaneo C Int J Legal Med; 2013 May; 127(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 23515681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dispersion assessment in the location of facial landmarks on photographs. Campomanes-Álvarez BR; Ibáñez O; Navarro F; Alemán I; Cordón O; Damas S Int J Legal Med; 2015 Jan; 129(1):227-36. PubMed ID: 24878615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of an automated method of 3D soft tissue landmark detection. Baksi S; Freezer S; Matsumoto T; Dreyer C Eur J Orthod; 2021 Dec; 43(6):622-630. PubMed ID: 33377968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Plooij JM; Swennen GR; Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Schutyser FA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]