These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34447139)

  • 21. Buccal bone thickness of posterior mandible for microscrews implantation in molar distalization.
    Wang Y; Sun J; Shi Y; Li X; Wang Z
    Ann Anat; 2022 Oct; 244():151993. PubMed ID: 36041697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immediate loaded two implants supporting a ball-retained mandibular overdenture: a 3-year randomized clinical trial.
    Elsyad MA; Al-Mahdy YF; Fouad MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 21504479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional Evaluation of Interradicular Areas and Cortical Bone Thickness for Orthodontic Miniscrew Implant Placement Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Dharmadeep G; Naik MK; Reddy YM; Cheruluri S; Praveen Raj K; Reddy BR
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2020 Aug; 12(Suppl 1):S99-S104. PubMed ID: 33149438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implications of Virtual CBCT-Based Immediate Implant Planning for Maxillary and Mandibular First Molars.
    Zhang LQ; Duan DH; Wang EB; Wang HL; Liu Z
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Oct; 48(5):386-390. PubMed ID: 34412125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bucco-lingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement.
    Covani U; Bortolaia C; Barone A; Sbordone L
    J Periodontol; 2004 Dec; 75(12):1605-12. PubMed ID: 15732861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
    Park J; Cho HJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Wide diameter immediate post-extractive implants vs delayed placement of normal-diameter implants in preserved sockets in the molar region: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.
    Checchi V; Felice P; Zucchelli G; Barausse C; Piattelli M; Pistilli R; Grandi G; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(3):263-278. PubMed ID: 28944355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bone level changes at axial- and non-axial-positioned implants supporting fixed partial dentures. A 5-year retrospective longitudinal study.
    Koutouzis T; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 17608740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risk Assessment of Lingual Plate Perforation in Anterior Edentulous Mandibular Region: A Virtual Implant Placement Study Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Taşdemir I; Kalabalik F; Aytuğar E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 33(8):2460-2462. PubMed ID: 35200204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Horizontal and vertical dimensional changes of peri-implant facial bone following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 1-year cone beam computed tomography study.
    Roe P; Kan JY; Rungcharassaeng K; Caruso JM; Zimmerman G; Mesquida J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):393-400. PubMed ID: 22442780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Photobiomodulation by a 635nm Diode Laser on Peri-Implant Bone: Primary and Secondary Stability and Bone Density Analysis-A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Matys J; Świder K; Grzech-Leśniak K; Dominiak M; Romeo U
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():2785302. PubMed ID: 31143771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative analysis of dual-axis implants placed into maxillary anterior extraction sockets versus virtual planning with uniaxial implants: A simulated cone beam computed tomography study of implant length and diameter.
    Song SJ; Chu SM; Chu SJ; Saito H; Levin BP; Egbert NL; Sarnachiaro GO; Tarnow DP
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Jan; 35(1):206-214. PubMed ID: 36628940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. One-year re-entry results of guided bone regeneration around immediately placed implants with immediate or conventional loading: a case series.
    Shibly O; Kutkut A; Albandar JM
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 14(3):62-8. PubMed ID: 22908535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction socket in the mandibular molar sites: a preliminary study of a modified insertion technique.
    Hamouda NI; Mourad SI; El-Kenawy MH; Maria OM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e107-16. PubMed ID: 23927366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest.
    Koutouzis T; Neiva R; Nair M; Nonhoff J; Lundgren T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 25216143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cone-beam computed tomography and digital model analysis of maxillary buccal alveolar bone thickness for vertical temporary skeletal anchorage device placement.
    Giap HV; Lee JY; Nguyen H; Chae HS; Kim YH; Shin JW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 May; 161(5):e429-e438. PubMed ID: 35346539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Comprehensive Assessment of Bone Losses in the Postoperative Phase of Single Implant Placed in Mandibular First Molar Regions: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Clinical Study.
    Dev SV; Perti S; Sahoo KK; Mohanty A; Pati SK; Sri AN
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Nov; 13(Suppl 2):S1530-S1534. PubMed ID: 35018023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of the location and diameter of implants on the stress distribution in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures under dynamic loads].
    Lü J; Liu C; Lan J; Gao X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 24437284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of circumferential crestal bone loss after 1 year of implant placement with flapless versus flap surgery using surgical template after immediate loading in the posterior mandibular region using cone-beam computed tomography: A randomized controlled trial.
    Dandekar S; Lahoti K; Gade J; Agrawal M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(3):226-233. PubMed ID: 37929361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of Implant Diameter and Ridge Dimension on Stress Distribution in Mandibular First Molar Sites-A Photoelastic Study.
    Termeie D; Klokkevold PR; Caputo AA
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):e165-73. PubMed ID: 25072829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.