BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34448275)

  • 1. A retrospective single-centre analysis of the oncological impact of LI-RADS classification applied to Metroticket 2.0 calculator in liver transplantation: every nodule matters.
    Centonze L; Di Sandro S; Lauterio A; De Carlis R; Sgrazzutti C; Ciulli C; Vella I; Vicentin I; Incarbone N; Bagnardi V; Vanzulli A; De Carlis L
    Transpl Int; 2021 Sep; 34(9):1712-1721. PubMed ID: 34448275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for the Characterization of Liver Nodules 20 mm or Smaller in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Huang JY; Li JW; Lu Q; Luo Y; Lin L; Shi YJ; Li T; Liu JB; Lyshchik A
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 31793849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. LI-RADS 4 or 5 categorization may not be clinically relevant for decision-making processes: A prospective cohort study.
    Piñero F; Thompson MA; Diaz Telli F; Trentacoste J; Padín C; Mendizabal M; Colaci C; Gonzalez Campaña A; Pages J; Montal S; Barreiro M; Fauda M; Podestá G; Perotti JP; Silva M
    Ann Hepatol; 2020; 19(6):662-667. PubMed ID: 32683095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 on CT for Determining Eligibility for Liver Transplant According to Milan Criteria in Patients at High Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Bae JS; Lee DH; Lee SM; Suh KS; Lee KW; Yi NJ; Lee KB; Kim H; Han JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 35138137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: ESCULAP versus CEUS-LI-RADS.
    Schellhaas B; Görtz RS; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Neurath MF; Strobel D
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1036-1044. PubMed ID: 28562394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
    Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim SS; Roh YH; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ
    Liver Int; 2020 Jun; 40(6):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 32145134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS.
    Ding J; Long L; Zhang X; Chen C; Zhou H; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Jing X; Ye Z; Wang F
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):847-854. PubMed ID: 32803416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
    Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast ultrasound LI-RADS LR-5 identifies hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in a multicenter restropective study of 1,006 nodules.
    Terzi E; Iavarone M; Pompili M; Veronese L; Cabibbo G; Fraquelli M; Riccardi L; De Bonis L; Sangiovanni A; Leoni S; Zocco MA; Rossi S; Alessi N; Wilson SR; Piscaglia F;
    J Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 68(3):485-492. PubMed ID: 29133247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A modified LI-RADS: targetoid tumors with enhancing capsule can be diagnosed as HCC instead of LR-M lesions.
    Min JH; Kim JM; Kim YK; Kim H; Choi GS; Kang TW; Cha D; Hwang JA; Ko SE; Ahn S
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):912-922. PubMed ID: 34345947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates.
    Oh NE; Choi SH; Kim S; Lee H; Jang HJ; Byun JH; Won HJ; Shin YM
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):465-474. PubMed ID: 37532900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporation of Ancillary MRI Features Into the LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Impact on Diagnostic Performance After Locoregional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kim YY; Kim MJ; Yoon JK; Shin J; Roh YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):484-493. PubMed ID: 34585608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for MRI and CT detection of HCC: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
    Liang Y; Xu F; Guo Y; Lai L; Jiang X; Wei X; Wu H; Wang J
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 134():109404. PubMed ID: 33276248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of LI-RADS 3 category by magnetic resonance in US-detected nodules ≤ 2 cm in cirrhotic patients.
    Darnell A; Rimola J; Belmonte E; Ripoll E; Garcia-Criado Á; Caparroz C; Díaz-González Á; Vilana R; Reig M; Ayuso C; Bruix J; Forner A
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4794-4803. PubMed ID: 33409789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT and MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim YY; Shin J; Hwang SH; Roh YH; Chung YE; Choi JY
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1199-1206. PubMed ID: 32640250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR versus CEUS LI-RADS for Distinguishing Hepatocellular Carcinoma from other Hepatic Malignancies in High-Risk Patients.
    Huang Z; Zhou P; Li S; Li K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 May; 47(5):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 33610338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy-A Systematic Review.
    van der Pol CB; Lim CS; Sirlin CB; McGrath TA; Salameh JP; Bashir MR; Tang A; Singal AG; Costa AF; Fowler K; McInnes MDF
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Mar; 156(4):976-986. PubMed ID: 30445016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Adding Ancillary Features to MRI Compared with Enhancement Patterns at CT and MRI.
    Park S; Joo I; Lee DH; Bae JS; Yoo J; Kim SW; Lee JM
    Radiology; 2020 Sep; 296(3):554-561. PubMed ID: 32692297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response Criteria After Thermal Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Cools KS; Moon AM; Burke LMB; McGinty KA; Strassle PD; Gerber DA
    Liver Transpl; 2020 Feb; 26(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 31677319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.