These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34448669)

  • 1. "One-stop shop" for the evaluation of the infertile patient: hystero-salpingo foam sonography combined with two and three dimensional ultrasound and sonohysterography.
    Zajicek M; Kassif E; Weisz B; Berkovitz Shperling R; Lipitz S; Weissbach T; Barzilay E; Orvieto R; Haas J
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 May; 42(4):670-674. PubMed ID: 34448669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
    Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.
    Ludwin I; Ludwin A; Wiechec M; Nocun A; Banas T; Basta P; Pitynski K
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape.
    Exacoustos C; Pizzo A; Lazzeri L; Pietropolli A; Piccione E; Zupi E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; Kleiman-Broeze KA; Traas MAF; Muijsers GJJM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; van Oostwaard MF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Peters HE; Lier MCI; Lambalk CB; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Stoker J; van der Veen F; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for Assessment of the Efficacy of Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
    Rosič M; Žegura B; Vadnjal Đonlagić S
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1929-1935. PubMed ID: 29344973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography to confirm tubal occlusion after Essure® placement as treatment for hydrosalpinges.
    Dreyer K; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Apr; 30(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 25682307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spontaneous pregnancy rates in infertile women after sequential hydrosonography and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography.
    Melcer Y; Shamir-Kaholi N; Vainer-Rotbart S; Pekar-Zlotin M; Youngster M; Gat I; Maymon R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():219-222. PubMed ID: 35231747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel concept for female infertility exploration: the Fertiliscan©, a dedicated all-in-one 3D ultrasound exploration.
    Levaillant JM; Pasquier M; Massin N
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 May; 48(5):363-367. PubMed ID: 30690086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating Fallopian Tube Patency: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.
    Grigovich M; Kacharia VS; Bharwani N; Hemingway A; Mijatovic V; Rodgers SK
    Radiographics; 2021 Oct; 41(6):1876-18961. PubMed ID: 34597232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing.
    Emanuel MH; van Vliet M; Weber M; Exalto N
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan; 27(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 22064649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Aspects of HyFoSy as Tubal Patency Test in Subfertility Workup.
    Exalto N; Emanuel MH
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():4827376. PubMed ID: 31360713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Live birth after additional tubal flushing with oil-based contrast versus no additional flushing: a randomised, multicentre, parallel-group pragmatic trial in infertile women with at least one patent tube at hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HYFOIL study).
    De Neubourg D; Janssens L; Verhaegen I; Smits E; Mol BW; Roelant E
    BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e054845. PubMed ID: 34845077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dreyer K; Out R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) more tolerable in terms of pain and anxiety than hysterosalpingography (HSG)? A prospective real-world setting multicentre study.
    Serrano González L; Pérez-Medina T; Bueno Olalla B; Royuela A; De La Cuesta MLR; Saéz de la Mata D; Domínguez-Franjo E; Calles-Sastre L; Engels V
    BMC Womens Health; 2022 Feb; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 35152893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hysterosalpingography is obsolete: hysterosalpingo-contrast foam sonography should be the alternative.
    Ramos J; Pellicer N; Fernández-Sánchez M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Nov; 45(5):839-842. PubMed ID: 35842356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy): Tolerability, safety and the occurrence of pregnancy post-procedure.
    Tanaka K; Chua J; Cincotta R; Ballard EL; Duncombe G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb; 58(1):114-118. PubMed ID: 28949014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility, tolerability, and safety of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (hyfosy). multicenter, prospective Spanish study.
    Engels V; Medina M; Antolín E; Ros C; Amaro A; De-Guirior C; Manzour N; Sotillo L; De la Cuesta R; Rodríguez R; San-Frutos L; Peralta S; Martin-Martínez A; Alcázar JL
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 50(5):102004. PubMed ID: 33242678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with saline medium (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency.
    Lim SL; Jung JJ; Yu SL; Rajesh H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec; 195():168-172. PubMed ID: 26547487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients?
    Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Johns DA; Luciano AA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 204(1):79.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21187197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.