These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34449072)

  • 1. Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus-response integration.
    Schmalbrock P; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):221-230. PubMed ID: 34449072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The specificity of temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2289-300. PubMed ID: 21970615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictability reduces event file retrieval.
    Schmalbrock P; Hommel B; Münchau A; Beste C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1073-1087. PubMed ID: 36577916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revisiting variable-foreperiod effects: evaluating the repetition priming account.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1193-1207. PubMed ID: 35391659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weakness and instability of time expectancy in schizophrenia.
    Mo SS; Kersey R; Huang DD
    J Clin Psychol; 1978 Jan; 34(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 641179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes.
    Laub R; Frings C; Moeller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1474-1488. PubMed ID: 29687358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.
    Laub R; Merz S; Dröschel H; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2256-2266. PubMed ID: 33768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Only time will tell the future: Anticipatory saccades reveal the temporal dynamics of time-based location and task expectancy.
    Pfeuffer CU; Aufschnaiter S; Thomaschke R; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1183-1200. PubMed ID: 32614216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased Automaticity and Altered Temporal Preparation Following Sleep Deprivation.
    Kong D; Asplund CL; Ling A; Chee MW
    Sleep; 2015 Aug; 38(8):1219-27. PubMed ID: 25845689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brightness versus darkness: The influence of stimulus intensity on the distractor-response binding effect.
    Laub R; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103224. PubMed ID: 33316459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes.
    Singh T; Moeller B; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2307-2312. PubMed ID: 27631631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mighty tool not only in perception: Figure-ground mechanisms control binding and retrieval alike.
    Schmalbrock P; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2255-2270. PubMed ID: 35610411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Change of Variable-Foreperiod Effects within an Experiment: A Bayesian Modeling Approach.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):40. PubMed ID: 36072112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.
    Moeller B; Schächinger H; Frings C
    J Vis Exp; 2014 May; (87):. PubMed ID: 24893586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When specific action biases meet nonspecific preparation: Event repetition modulates the variable-foreperiod effect.
    Langner R; Steinborn MB; Eickhoff SB; Huestegge L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1313-1323. PubMed ID: 29975096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):953-64. PubMed ID: 21264746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variable foreperiods and temporal discrimination.
    Grondin S; Rammsayer T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 May; 56(4):731-65. PubMed ID: 12745838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.
    Giesen C; Frings C; Rothermund K
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.