These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34450297)

  • 1. Association Between Endoscopist Specialty and Colonoscopy Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mazurek M; Murray A; Heitman SJ; Ruan Y; Antoniou SA; Boyne D; Murthy S; Baxter NN; Datta I; Shorr R; Ma C; Swain MG; Hilsden RJ; Brenner DR; Forbes N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Sep; 20(9):1931-1946. PubMed ID: 34450297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association Between Endoscopist Annual Procedure Volume and Colonoscopy Quality: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Forbes N; Boyne DJ; Mazurek MS; Hilsden RJ; Sutherland RL; Pader J; Ruan Y; Shaheen AA; Wong C; Lamidi M; Lorenzetti DL; Brenner DR; Heitman SJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Sep; 18(10):2192-2208.e12. PubMed ID: 32240836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Training interventions to improve adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lim S; Hammond S; Park J; Hochman D; Lê ML; Rabbani R; Abou-Setta A; Zarychanski R
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):3870-3882. PubMed ID: 31595401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bishay K; Causada-Calo N; Scaffidi MA; Walsh CM; Anderson JT; Rostom A; Dube C; Keswani RN; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Shorr R; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Nov; 92(5):1030-1040.e9. PubMed ID: 32330506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of Colonoscopy: A Comparison Between Gastroenterologists and Nongastroenterologists.
    Muthukuru S; Alomari M; Bisen R; Parikh MP; Al Momani L; Talal Sarmini M; Lopez R; Muthukuru S; Thota PN; Sanaka MR
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jul; 63(7):980-987. PubMed ID: 32496332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of procedural outcomes between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons.
    Modi S; Picado O; Fiser C; Lubarsky M; Giri B; Hui V; Force L; Marchetti F; Sands LR; Paluvoi NV
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6543-6550. PubMed ID: 35024931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
    Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopist specialty is associated with colonoscopy quality.
    Jiang M; Sewitch MJ; Barkun AN; Joseph L; Hilsden RJ
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 May; 13():78. PubMed ID: 23638769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of time of day and specialty on polyp detection rates in Australia.
    Zorron Cheng Tao Pu L; Lu K; Ovenden A; Rana K; Singh G; Krishnamurthi S; Edwards S; Wilson B; Nakamura M; Yamamura T; Ruszkiewicz A; Hirooka Y; Burt AD; Singh R
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 34(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 30552716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Educational interventions are associated with improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Causada-Calo NS; Gonzalez-Moreno EI; Bishay K; Shorr R; Dube C; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Rostom A; Walsh C; Anderson JT; Keswani RN; Scaffidi MA; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Oct; 8(10):E1321-E1331. PubMed ID: 33015334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Irrespective of Indication Is Comparable to Screening ADR: Implications for Quality Monitoring.
    Kaltenbach T; Gawron A; Meyer CS; Gupta S; Shergill A; Dominitz JA; Soetikno RM; Nguyen-Vu T; A Whooley M; Kahi CJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1883-1889.e1. PubMed ID: 33618027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.
    Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopist-related factors affecting adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Data from the J-SCOUT study.
    Kawamura T; Sekiguchi M; Takamaru H; Mizuguchi Y; Horiguchi G; Toyoizumi H; Kato M; Kobayashi K; Sada M; Oda Y; Yokoyama A; Utsumi T; Tsuji Y; Ohki D; Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Ikematsu H; Matsuda K; Teramukai S; Kobayashi N; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Tanaka K
    Dig Endosc; 2024 Jan; 36(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 37953649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gastroenterologist focus of clinical practice affects adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy.
    Razjouyan H; Kim M; Levenick J; Clarke K; McGarrity T
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 May; 102(20):e33818. PubMed ID: 37335731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
    Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria.
    Waldmann E; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Jeschek P; Britto-Arias M; Heinze G; Fasching E; Weiss W; Gschwantler M; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2016 Dec; 48(12):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 27576182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Significant Variation in the Detection Rates of Proximal Serrated Polyps Among Academic Gastroenterologists, Community Gastroenterologists, and Colorectal Surgeons in a Single Tertiary Care Center.
    Mandaliya R; Baig K; Barnhill M; Murugesan V; Som A; Mohammed U; Jhaveri K; Vangimalla SS; Raymond A; Tran J; Hasan L; Lewis JH; Cho W
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(9):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 31152331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.