These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34450394)

  • 1. Reasoning strategy vs cognitive capacity as predictors of individual differences in reasoning performance.
    Thompson VA; Markovits H
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104866. PubMed ID: 34450394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reasoning strategies predict use of very fast logical reasoning.
    Markovits H; de Chantal PL; Brisson J; Dubé É; Thompson V; Newman I
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):532-543. PubMed ID: 33057905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who resists belief-biased inferences? The role of individual differences in reasoning strategies, working memory, and attentional focus.
    de Chantal PL; Newman IR; Thompson V; Markovits H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):655-671. PubMed ID: 31792857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which cognitive individual differences predict good Bayesian reasoning? Concurrent comparisons of underlying abilities.
    Brase G
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Feb; 49(2):235-248. PubMed ID: 32815106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasoning strategies explain individual differences in social reasoning.
    Gagnon-St-Pierre É; Doucerain MM; Markovits H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):340-353. PubMed ID: 32897098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A diffusion model analysis of belief bias: Different cognitive mechanisms explain how cognitive abilities and thinking styles contribute to conflict resolution in reasoning.
    Schubert AL; Ferreira MB; Mata A; Riemenschneider B
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104629. PubMed ID: 33626418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reasoning strategy modulates gender differences in performance on a spatial rotation task.
    Markovits H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Dec; 72(12):2870-2876. PubMed ID: 31315513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Highly reflective reasoners show no signs of belief inhibition.
    Svedholm-Häkkinen AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jan; 154():69-76. PubMed ID: 25499057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning.
    Markovits H; Forgues HL; Brunet ML
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):736-47. PubMed ID: 22287219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactions between inferential strategies and belief bias.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL; Thompson VA
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Oct; 45(7):1182-1192. PubMed ID: 28608194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasoning strategies determine the effect of disconfirmation on belief in false claims.
    Gratton C; Markovits H
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1528-1536. PubMed ID: 34050493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are There Two Kinds of Reasoners?
    Markovits H
    J Intell; 2024 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38535159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Logical reasoning versus information processing in the dual-strategy model of reasoning.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 27176044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The bright homunculus in our head: Individual differences in intuitive sensitivity to logical validity.
    Ghasemi O; Handley S; Howarth S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):508-535. PubMed ID: 34427470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Hagmayer Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 23794254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye movements provide insight into individual differences in children's analogical reasoning strategies.
    Starr A; Vendetti MS; Bunge SA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():18-26. PubMed ID: 29669270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive Factors that Predict Gambling Fallacy Endorsement.
    Shaw CA; Williams RJ; Violo VT; Williams JN; Demetrovics Z; Delfabbro P
    J Gambl Stud; 2023 Jun; 39(2):843-855. PubMed ID: 36565358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reasoning strategies modulate gender differences in emotion processing.
    Markovits H; Trémolière B; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():76-82. PubMed ID: 28950178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):577-591. PubMed ID: 28383994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in relational reasoning.
    Gray ME; Holyoak KJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):96-110. PubMed ID: 31317394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.