These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34452620)
1. Footprint measurement methods for the assessment and classification of foot types in subjects with Down syndrome: a systematic review. Gutiérrez-Vilahú L; Guerra-Balic M J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Aug; 16(1):537. PubMed ID: 34452620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and Validity of the Footprint Assessment Method Using Photoshop CS5 Software in Young People with Down Syndrome. Gutiérrez-Vilahú L; Massó-Ortigosa N; Rey-Abella F; Costa-Tutusaus L; Guerra-Balic M J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2016 May; 106(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 27269976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The identification and reliability of static and dynamic barefoot impression measurements: A systematic review. Hu A; Arnold JB; Causby R; Jones S Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():156-164. PubMed ID: 29864603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic footprint measurement collection technique and intrarater reliability: ink mat, paper pedography, and electronic pedography. Fascione JM; Crews RT; Wrobel JS J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2012; 102(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 22461270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of skeletal characteristics of flat feet using three-dimensional foot scanner and digital footprint. Yamashita T; Yamashita K; Sato M; Kawasumi M; Ata S Biomed Eng Online; 2022 Aug; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 35945533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and Validity of the Footprint Assessment Method Using Photoshop CS5 Software. Gutiérrez-Vilahú L; Massó-Ortigosa N; Costa-Tutusaus L; Guerra-Balic M J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2015 May; 105(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 26146968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability between Clarke's angle and Chippaux-Smirak index for the diagnosis of flat feet. Gonzalez-Martin C; Pita-Fernandez S; Seoane-Pillado T; Lopez-Calviño B; Pertega-Diaz S; Gil-Guillen V Colomb Med (Cali); 2017 Mar; 48(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28559643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paediatric flexible flat foot: how are we measuring it and are we getting it right? A systematic review. Banwell HA; Paris ME; Mackintosh S; Williams CM J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():21. PubMed ID: 29854006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medial Longitudinal Arch: Accuracy, Reliability, and Correlation Between Navicular Drop Test and Footprint Parameters. Zuil-Escobar JC; Martínez-Cepa CB; Martín-Urrialde JA; Gómez-Conesa A J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2018 Oct; 41(8):672-679. PubMed ID: 30573198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system. Queen RM; Mall NA; Hardaker WM; Nunley JA Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Apr; 28(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 17475140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The identification and appraisal of assessment tools used to evaluate metatarsus adductus: a systematic review of their measurement properties. Marshall N; Ward E; Williams CM J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():25. PubMed ID: 29881466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discordance of the Evaluation of the Plantar Footprint in Kidney Transplant. González-Martín C; Balboa-Barreiro V; Veiga-Seijo R; Seoane-Pillado T; Lema-Verdía L; Couceiro-Sanchez E J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2021 Mar; 111(2):. PubMed ID: 33872368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of footprint analysis to determine flatfoot using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard in a random sample aged 40 years and older. Pita-Fernández S; González-Martín C; Seoane-Pillado T; López-Calviño B; Pértega-Díaz S; Gil-Guillén V J Epidemiol; 2015; 25(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 25382154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative assessment of flatfoot in preschool children. Fuentes-Venado CE; Ángeles-Ayala A; Salcedo-Trejo MS; Sumano-Pérez LJ; Valle CYV; Martínez-Herrera EO; León MGF; González-Gutiérrez LE; Monjaras-Bernal IG; Pinto-Almazán R Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex; 2020; 77(6):312-319. PubMed ID: 33186341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between body mass index and footprint parameters in older people. Yousefi Azarfam AA; Ozdemir O; Altuntaş O; Cetin A; Gökçe Kutsal Y Foot (Edinb); 2014 Dec; 24(4):186-9. PubMed ID: 25241264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot: Correlations, Reliability, and Accuracy in People With a Low Arch. Zuil-Escobar JC; Martínez-Cepa CB; Martín-Urrialde JA; Gómez-Conesa A Phys Ther; 2019 Mar; 99(3):364-372. PubMed ID: 30535273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-radiographic validity and reliability measures for assessing foot types: A systematic review. Carrasco AC; Silva MF; Guenka LC; Silva CT; Moura FA; Cardoso JR Foot Ankle Surg; 2021 Dec; 27(8):839-850. PubMed ID: 33431323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bare footprint metric analysis methods for comparison and identification in forensic examinations: A review of literature. Mukhra R; Krishan K; Kanchan T J Forensic Leg Med; 2018 Aug; 58():101-112. PubMed ID: 29777981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Harris Imprint Index, Chippaux-Smirak Index, Staheli Index Compared With Talar-First Metatarsal Angle for Screening Arch of Foot. Paecharoen S; Arunakul M; Tantivangphaisal N Ann Rehabil Med; 2023 Jun; 47(3):222-227. PubMed ID: 37317797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]