BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34454282)

  • 1. Distracting tasks have persisting effects on young and older drivers' braking performance.
    Bock O; Stojan R; Wechsler K; Mack M; Voelcker-Rehage C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Oct; 161():106363. PubMed ID: 34454282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modelling braking behaviour of distracted young drivers in car-following interactions: A grouped random parameters duration model with heterogeneity-in-means.
    Ali Y; Haque MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107015. PubMed ID: 36889237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of additional tasks on the reaction time of braking responses in simulated car driving: beyond the PRP effect.
    Stojan R; Bock O; Mack M; Voelcker-Rehage C
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38914809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers.
    Saifuzzaman M; Haque MM; Zheng Z; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():10-9. PubMed ID: 26009990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():67-77. PubMed ID: 28189943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driving Frequency Modulates Correlations Between Executive Functions and Driving Performance: A Driving Simulator Study.
    Lo YH; Chiu A; Tseng P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2023 Dec; 130(6):2410-2429. PubMed ID: 37962038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups.
    Ortiz C; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Castro JJ; Casares-López M; Salas C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():239-249. PubMed ID: 29723735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Good distractions: Testing the effects of listening to an audiobook on driving performance in simple and complex road environments.
    Nowosielski RJ; Trick LM; Toxopeus R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():202-209. PubMed ID: 29223795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
    Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.
    Tivesten E; Dozza M
    J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():87-96. PubMed ID: 25934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of naturalistic driving videos of fleet services drivers to estimate driver error and potentially distracting behaviors as risk factors for rear-end versus angle crashes.
    Harland KK; Carney C; McGehee D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26760293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Smartwatches are more distracting than mobile phones while driving: Results from an experimental study.
    Brodeur M; Ruer P; Léger PM; Sénécal S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105846. PubMed ID: 33181456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.
    Fu R; Chen Y; Xu Q; Guo Y; Yuan W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32781529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multitasking During Simulated Car Driving: A Comparison of Young and Older Persons.
    Wechsler K; Drescher U; Janouch C; Haeger M; Voelcker-Rehage C; Bock O
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():910. PubMed ID: 29962983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Visual and Acoustic Distraction on Driving Behavior and EEG in Young and Older Car Drivers: A Driving Simulation Study.
    Karthaus M; Wascher E; Getzmann S
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2018; 10():420. PubMed ID: 30618726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.