192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34454694)
1. Genotoxicity test battery - An assessment of its utility in early drug development.
Baldrick P
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2021; 868-869():503388. PubMed ID: 34454694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation. Part II: Performances of the in vitro micronucleus test compared to the mouse lymphoma assay and the in vitro chromosome aberration assay.
Lorge E; Lambert C; Gervais V; Becourt-Lhote N; Delongeas JL; Claude N
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Apr; 96(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 17192442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Appropriate in vivo follow-up assays to an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test positive investigational drug candidate (active pharmaceutical ingredient), drug-related metabolite, or drug-related impurity.
Robison TW; Heflich RH; Manjanatha MG; Elespuru R; Atrakchi A; Mei N; Ding W
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2021; 868-869():503386. PubMed ID: 34454692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of single-wall carbon nanotubes by using a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays.
Naya M; Kobayashi N; Mizuno K; Matsumoto K; Ema M; Nakanishi J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Nov; 61(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 21821090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo.
Kirkland D; Speit G
Mutat Res; 2008 Jul; 654(2):114-32. PubMed ID: 18585956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of the natural neurotoxin Tetrodotoxin (TTX) in a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays.
Guzmán A; Fernández de Henestrosa AR; Marín AP; Ho A; Borroto JI; Carasa I; Pritchard L
Mutat Res; 2007 Dec; 634(1-2):14-24. PubMed ID: 17881283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genotoxicity evaluation for single-walled carbon nanotubes in a battery of in vitro and in vivo assays.
Ema M; Imamura T; Suzuki H; Kobayashi N; Naya M; Nakanishi J
J Appl Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 33(9):933-9. PubMed ID: 22763644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity utilizing a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests.
Kim BS; Margolin BH
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 10618179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genotoxicity Assessment of Nanomaterials: Recommendations on Best Practices, Assays, and Methods.
Elespuru R; Pfuhler S; Aardema MJ; Chen T; Doak SH; Doherty A; Farabaugh CS; Kenny J; Manjanatha M; Mahadevan B; Moore MM; Ouédraogo G; Stankowski LF; Tanir JY
Toxicol Sci; 2018 Aug; 164(2):391-416. PubMed ID: 29701824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genotoxicity studies OF p-dimethylaminoazobenzene (DAB).
Suzuki H; Komatsu K; Imamura T; Miyazaki A; Kobayashi T; Nomura M
J Toxicol Sci; 2006 Oct; 31(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 17077593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lanthanum nitrate genotoxicity evaluation: Ames test, mouse micronucleus assay, and chromosome aberration test.
Yang H; Zhang X; Liu H; Cui W; Zhang Q; Li Y; Yu Z; Jia X
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 Nov; 810():1-5. PubMed ID: 27776686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests.
Kirkland D; Kasper P; Martus HJ; Müller L; van Benthem J; Madia F; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 Jan; 795():7-30. PubMed ID: 26774663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of vinyl laurate in a battery of in vitro and in vivo tests for genotoxicity.
van Acker F; Messinger H; Bär A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jun; 72(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 25445001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experiences with the in vivo and in vitro comet assay in regulatory testing.
Frötschl R
Mutagenesis; 2015 Jan; 30(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25527728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of in vitro γH2AX assay in HepG2 cells to predict in vivo genotoxicity.
Tsamou M; Jennen DG; Claessen SM; Magkoufopoulou C; Kleinjans JC; van Delft JH
Mutagenesis; 2012 Nov; 27(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 22914676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the genotoxicity of Eriobotrya japonica leaf extract.
Jeong MH; Seong NW; Lee JY; Kim YJ; Shin NR; Kim JC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Nov; 99():238-243. PubMed ID: 30268829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
