BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34454723)

  • 1. Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic, and open pancreatoduodenectomy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.
    Kabir T; Tan HL; Syn NL; Wu EJ; Kam JH; Goh BKP
    Surgery; 2022 Feb; 171(2):476-489. PubMed ID: 34454723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Lin D; Yu Z; Chen X; Chen W; Zou Y; Hu J
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jan; 112(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 31823640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wehrle CJ; Chang JH; Gross AR; Woo K; Naples R; Stackhouse KA; Dahdaleh F; Augustin T; Joyce D; Simon R; Walsh RM; Naffouje SA
    Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2602-2610. PubMed ID: 38498210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis.
    Zhang H; Lan X; Peng B; Li B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 25(37):5711-5731. PubMed ID: 31602170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study.
    Emmen AMLH; Zwart MJW; Khatkov IE; Boggi U; Groot Koerkamp B; Busch OR; Saint-Marc O; Dokmak S; Molenaar IQ; D'Hondt M; Ramera M; Keck T; Ferrari G; Luyer MDP; Moraldi L; Ielpo B; Wittel U; Souche FR; Hackert T; Lips D; Can MF; Bosscha K; Fara R; Festen S; van Dieren S; Coratti A; De Hingh I; Mazzola M; Wellner U; De Meyere C; van Santvoort HC; Aussilhou B; Ibenkhayat A; de Wilde RF; Kauffmann EF; Tyutyunnik P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
    Surgery; 2024 Jun; 175(6):1587-1594. PubMed ID: 38570225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.
    Yan JF; Pan Y; Chen K; Zhu HP; Chen QL
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Aug; 98(32):e16730. PubMed ID: 31393381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula.
    McMillan MT; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Kowalsky SJ; Zeh HJ; Sprys MH; Vollmer CM
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 28030724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.
    Xourafas D; Pawlik TM; Cloyd JM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Nov; 22(11):1911-1919. PubMed ID: 29943136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Surgical Factors on Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes: Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Cacciamani GE; Medina LG; Gill T; Abreu A; Sotelo R; Artibani W; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):258-274. PubMed ID: 29580709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Management of Non-traumatic Splenic Pathologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bhattacharya P; Phelan L; Fisher S; Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S
    Am Surg; 2022 Jan; 88(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 33596106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    de Rooij T; van Hilst J; Bosscha K; Dijkgraaf MG; Gerhards MF; Groot Koerkamp B; Hagendoorn J; de Hingh IH; Karsten TM; Lips DJ; Luyer MD; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Tran TCK; Busch OR; Festen S; Besselink MG;
    Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 29298706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
    Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted Total Gastrectomy for advanced gastric Cancer: a propensity score matching study.
    Yang C; Shi Y; Xie S; Chen J; Zhao Y; Qian F; Hao Y; Tang B; Yu P
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Jul; 20(1):669. PubMed ID: 32680479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy.
    Chang YS; Wang JX; Chang DW
    J Surg Res; 2015 May; 195(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 25770742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: nationwide propensity-score-matched analysis.
    de Graaf N; Zwart MJW; van Hilst J; van den Broek B; Bonsing BA; Busch OR; Coene PLO; Daams F; van Dieren S; van Eijck CHJ; Festen S; de Hingh IHJT; Lips DJ; Luyer MDP; Mieog JSD; van Santvoort HC; van der Schelling GP; Stommel MWJ; de Wilde RF; Molenaar IQ; Groot Koerkamp B; Besselink MG
    Br J Surg; 2024 Jan; 111(2):. PubMed ID: 38415878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.
    Uijterwijk BA; Lemmers DHL; Bolm L; Luyer M; Koh YX; Mazzola M; Webber L; Kazemier G; Bannone E; Ramaekers M; Ielpo B; Wellner U; Koek S; Giani A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
    Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e570-e579. PubMed ID: 36730852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
    Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
    Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to treat symptomatic achalasia: systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Milone M; Manigrasso M; Vertaldi S; Velotti N; Aprea G; Maione F; Gennarelli N; De Simone G; De Conno B; Pesce M; Sarnelli G; De Palma GD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Dec; 32(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 31274153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of outcomes after open, mini-laparotomy, hybrid, totally laparoscopic, and robotic living donor right hepatectomy.
    Yeow M; Soh S; Starkey G; Perini MV; Koh YX; Tan EK; Chan CY; Raj P; Goh BKP; Kabir T
    Surgery; 2022 Aug; 172(2):741-750. PubMed ID: 35644687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Weng Y; Jiang Y; Fu N; Jin J; Shi Y; Huo Z; Deng X; Peng C; Shen B
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3437-3448. PubMed ID: 32696148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.