These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34456182)
1. Evaluating An Automated Compounding Workflow Software for Safety and Efficiency: Implementation Study. Meren ÜH; Waterson J JMIR Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 8(4):e29180. PubMed ID: 34456182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)]. ; ; Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation and evaluation of a gravimetric i.v. workflow software system in an oncology ambulatory care pharmacy. Reece KM; Lozano MA; Roux R; Spivey SM Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2016 Feb; 73(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 26796911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic Pharmacy Implementation and Outcomes in Saudi Arabia: A 21-Month Usability Study. Momattin H; Arafa S; Momattin S; Rahal R; Waterson J JMIR Hum Factors; 2021 Sep; 8(3):e28381. PubMed ID: 34304149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of telepharmacy and the use of a gravimetric technology-assisted workflow system for remote sterile product pharmacist checks. Jean SJ; Francart SJ; Eckel SF; Schenkat D; Eberwein S; Lamm M; Barnes N; Valgus JM; Amerine LB Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2020 Mar; 77(7):560-567. PubMed ID: 32086506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sterile product compounding using an i.v. compounding workflow management system at a pediatric hospital. Moniz TT; Chu S; Tom C; Lutz P; Arnold A; Gura KM; Patterson A Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2014 Aug; 71(15):1311-7. PubMed ID: 25027539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of technology-assisted versus manual sterile compounding on safety and efficiency in a Canadian community hospital. Fan M; Yang D; Ng B; Jackson J; Bouris K; Eng S; Rolko E; Trbovich P Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2022 Sep; 79(19):1685-1696. PubMed ID: 35700925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of real-time data obtained from gravimetric preparation of antineoplastic agents shows medication errors with possible critical therapeutic impact: Results of a large-scale, multicentre, multinational, retrospective study. Terkola R; Czejka M; Bérubé J J Clin Pharm Ther; 2017 Aug; 42(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 28429389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Introduction of Robotics to an Outpatient Dispensing and Medication Management Process in Saudi Arabia: Retrospective Review of a Pharmacy-led Multidisciplinary Six Sigma Performance Improvement Project. Al Nemari M; Waterson J JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Oct; 9(4):e37905. PubMed ID: 36222805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. E-prescribing errors identified in a compounding pharmacy: a quality-improvement project. Reed-Kane D; Kittell K; Adkins J; Flocks S; Nguyen T Int J Pharm Compd; 2014; 18(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 24881345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Compounding & dispensing errors before and after implementing barcode technology in a nuclear pharmacy. Galbraith W; Shadid J Int J Pharm Compd; 2012; 16(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 23050303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Errors detected in pediatric oral liquid medication doses prepared in an automated workflow management system. Bledsoe S; Van Buskirk A; Falconer RJ; Hollon A; Hoebing W; Jokic S Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Feb; 75(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29371193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated compounding technology and workflow solutions for the preparation of chemotherapy: a systematic review. Batson S; Mitchell SA; Lau D; Canobbio M; de Goede A; Singh I; Loesch U Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2020 Nov; 27(6):330-336. PubMed ID: 33097615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of an i.v.-compounding robot in a hospital-based cancer center pharmacy. Yaniv AW; Knoer SJ Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2013 Nov; 70(22):2030-7. PubMed ID: 24173011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of IV oncology infusions compounded via robotics and gravimetrics-assisted workflow processes. Pang B; Earl M; Knoer S; Yaniv A; Willner M; Boyd A Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2021 Jan; 78(2):122-134. PubMed ID: 33064792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of barcode scanning by pharmacy technicians and pharmacists' visual checks for final product verification. Wang BN; Brummond P; Stevenson JG Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2016 Jan; 73(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 26721536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increasing pharmacy productivity and reducing medication turnaround times in an Italian comprehensive cancer center by implementing robotic chemotherapy drugs compounding. Capilli M; Enrico F; Federici M; Comandone T J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2022 Mar; 28(2):353-361. PubMed ID: 33567974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chemotherapy order second check and error discovery rates by pharmacists and technicians. Gundrum D; Brown K; Collingridge DS J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2021; 61(5):e132-e141. PubMed ID: 34023280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parenteral product error detection before and after implementation of intravenous workflow management technology. Wright KR; Dekarske B; Clark JS; Chaffee BW J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2019 Jan; 25(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28776479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilization of a technology-assisted workflow to prepare controlled substance oral syringes. Nester T; Proffitt K; Anderson J; Hays A; Eidem L; Greszler C Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2023 Aug; 80(16):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 37210711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]